Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31531768›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application.

Joao Beleboni Marques, Darren James Paul, Phil Graham-Smith, Paul James Read

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gym-Based Training Interventions for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Reduction in American Football Players.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Return to play in elite rugby players after severe knee injuries.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joao Beleboni MarquesAspetar, Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Sports City Street, Al Waab, Beverly Hills Garden 14, Villa 30, P.O. Box 29222, Doha, Qatar. joao.marques@aspetar.com.
Darren James PaulAspetar, Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Sports City Street, Al Waab, Beverly Hills Garden 14, Villa 30, P.O. Box 29222, Doha, Qatar.
Phil Graham-SmithAspire Academy, Sports City Street, P.O. Box 29222, Doha, Qatar.
Paul James ReadAspetar, Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Sports City Street, Al Waab, Beverly Hills Garden 14, Villa 30, P.O. Box 29222, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Change of direction (CoD) has been indicated as a key mechanism in the occurrence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury during invasion sports. Despite these associations, assessments of knee function in athletic populations at the time of return to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLr) have often focused on strength and single-leg hop tests, with a paucity of evidence to describe the CoD characteristics. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review was to describe the movement strategies exhibited following ACLr during CoD tasks and to critically analyze the range of tests that have been used. Specifically, we examined their ability to identify between-limb deficits and individuals who display a heightened risk of secondary injury and/or reductions in their level of pre-injury performance. MEDLINE, PubMed and SPORT Discuss databases were used and 13 articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Examination of the available literature indicates that current field-based practices are not representative of relevant sport demands and are unable to effectively assess knee function following ACLr. Laboratory-based studies have identified residual deficits and altered movement strategies at the time of return to sport, and this in part may be related to risk of re-injury. However, these assessments exhibit inherent limitations and are not practically viable for monitoring progress during rehabilitation. Consequently, alternative solutions that are more-aligned with the multitude of factors occurring during CoD maneuvers in chaotic sports environments are warranted to allow practitioners to 'bridge the gap' between the laboratory and the sports field/court. This approach may facilitate a more informed decision-making process with the end goal being, a heightened 'return to performance' and a lower risk of re-injury.

Indexed as

Return to SportAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAthletic InjuriesHumansKnee InjuriesTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31531768
PMCPMC6942029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.