Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31531723›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

Is Annual Preoperative Utilization an Indicator of Postoperative Surgical Outcomes? A Study in Medicare Expenditure.

J Madison Hyer, Diamantis I Tsilimigras, Anghela Z Paredes, Kota Sahara, Susan White, Timothy M Pawlik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Variations in Healthcare Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Resection of Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J Madison HyerDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA.
Diamantis I TsilimigrasDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA.
Anghela Z ParedesDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kota SaharaDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA.
Susan WhiteDepartment of Financial Services, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA. tim.pawlik@osumc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionData on the association of high preoperative healthcare utilization and adverse clinical outcomes are scarce. We sought to evaluate the role of annual preoperative expenditure (APE) as a surrogate for latent variables of risk for adverse short-term postoperative outcomes.

methodsLow and super-utilizers who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass graft, colectomy, total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, or lung resection between 2013 and 2015 were identified from 100% Medicare Inpatient Standard Analytic Files. To assess the association between APE and postoperative outcomes, multivariable logistic regression was utilized.

resultsAmong 1,049,160 patients, 788,488 (75.1%) and 21,700 (2.1%) patients were preoperative low- and super-utilizers, respectively. Median APE was more than 60 times higher among super-utilizers than low-utilizers ($57,160 vs. $932), as was the cost of the surgical episode ($21,141 vs. $13,179). The predictive ability of APE ranged from 0.683 (95% CI 0.678-0.687) for 90-day readmission to 0.882 (95% CI 0.879-0.886) for a complication at the index hospitalization. Among super-utilizers, the odds of a complication during the surgical episode was nearly double versus low-utilizers (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.89-2.04). Super-utilizers also had an increased odds of 30-day readmission (OR = 1.64, 95% CI 1.58-1.69) and mortality (OR = 2.22; 95% CI 2.04-2.42).

conclusionAPE was able to predict adverse postsurgical outcomes including complications during the surgical episode, readmission, and 90-day mortality. APE should be considered in the assessment of patient populations when defining risk of adverse postoperative events.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresPatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePostoperative Complications

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.