Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31531674›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2019

Evaluating stably expressed genes in single cells.

Yingxin Lin, Shila Ghazanfar, Dario Strbenac, Andy Wang, Ellis Patrick, David M Lin, Terence Speed, Jean Y H Yang, Pengyi Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ASPEN: Robust detection of allelic dynamics in single cell RNA-seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. PD-1 is requisite for skin TNature immunology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yingxin LinSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Shila GhazanfarSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Dario StrbenacSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Andy WangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Ellis PatrickSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
David M LinDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Terence SpeedBioinformatics Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Jean Y H YangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Pengyi YangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUCornell University · USThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Protocadherins in vertebrate self recognitionR21DC015107 · NIDCD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, DAVID M. · 2017 to 2018
$412k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) profiling has revealed remarkable variation in transcription, suggesting that expression of many genes at the single-cell level is intrinsically stochastic and noisy. Yet, on the cell population level, a subset of genes traditionally referred to as housekeeping genes (HKGs) are found to be stably expressed in different cell and tissue types. It is therefore critical to question whether stably expressed genes (SEGs) can be identified on the single-cell level, and if so, how can their expression stability be assessed? We have previously proposed a computational framework for ranking expression stability of genes in single cells for scRNA-seq data normalization and integration. In this study, we perform detailed evaluation and characterization of SEGs derived from this framework.

resultsHere, we show that gene expression stability indices derived from the early human and mouse development scRNA-seq datasets and the "Mouse Atlas" dataset are reproducible and conserved across species. We demonstrate that SEGs identified from single cells based on their stability indices are considerably more stable than HKGs defined previously from cell populations across diverse biological systems. Our analyses indicate that SEGs are inherently more stable at the single-cell level and their characteristics reminiscent of HKGs, suggesting their potential role in sustaining essential functions in individual cells.

conclusionsSEGs identified in this study have immediate utility both for understanding variation and stability of single-cell transcriptomes and for practical applications such as scRNA-seq data normalization. Our framework for calculating gene stability index, "scSEGIndex," is incorporated into the scMerge Bioconductor R package (https://sydneybiox.github.io/scMerge/reference/scSEGIndex.html) and can be used for identifying genes with stable expression in scRNA-seq datasets.

Indexed as

RNA-SeqSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsGene ExpressionHumansMicegene expression variabilityhousekeeping genesscRNA-seqsingle cellsstably expressed genes

Identifiers

PMID31531674
PMCPMC6748759
OpenAlexW2973694021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.