Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31531445›Full record

ReviewNanoscale2019

The application of nanotechnology in enhancing immunotherapy for cancer treatment: current effects and perspective.

Yongjiang Li, Ciceron Ayala-Orozco, Pradipta Ranjan Rauta, Sunil Krishnan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanoscale, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. CAR T Cell Therapy: A Versatile Living Drug.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mesoporous Silica Materials as an Emerging Tool for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yongjiang LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China. yongjiangcarl@yeah.net yli56@mdanderson.org and Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. skrishnan@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-6841
Ciceron Ayala-OrozcoDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. skrishnan@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2574-0860
Pradipta Ranjan RautaDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. skrishnan@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2874-0209
Sunil KrishnanDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. skrishnan@mdanderson.org and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-4771
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Translational Pre/Postdoctoral Program in Cancer NanotechnologyT32CA196561 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Gang Bao, Konstantin V Sokolov · 2015 to 2026
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA196561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy is emerging as a promising treatment modality that suppresses and eliminates tumors by re-activating and maintaining the tumor-immune cycle, and further enhancing the body's anti-tumor immune response. Despite the impressive therapeutic potential of immunotherapy approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and tumor vaccines in pre-clinical and clinical applications, the effective response is limited by insufficient accumulation in tumor tissues and severe side-effects. Recent years have witnessed the rise of nanotechnology as a solution to improve these technical weaknesses due to its inherent biophysical properties and multifunctional modifying potential. In this review, we summarized and discussed the current status of nanoparticle-enhanced cancer immunotherapy strategies, including intensified delivery of tumor vaccines and immune adjuvants, immune checkpoint inhibitor vehicles, targeting capacity to tumor-draining lymph nodes and immune cells, triggered releasing and regulating specific tumor microenvironments, and adoptive cell therapy enhancement effects.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNanotechnologyAdjuvants, ImmunologicCancer VaccinesDrug CarriersHumansNanoparticlesNeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicCancer VaccinesDrug Carriers

Identifiers

PMID31531445
PMCPMC6778734
OpenAlexW2969320333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.