Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31531412›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2018

Multiple mediators approach to study environmental chemicals as determinants of health disparities.

Andrea Bellavia, Ami R Zota, Linda Valeri, Tamarra James-Todd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A pipeline for enabling path-specific causal fairness in observational health data.Proceedings of the ... Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea BellaviaDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.
Ami R ZotaDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.
Linda ValeriPsychiatric Biostatistics Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, 02478.
Tamarra James-ToddDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.

Funding

Phthalates, Gestational Diabetes, and Markers of Type 2 Diabetes Risk in WomenR01ES026166 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI JAMES-TODD, TAMARRA M · 2016 to 2021
$2.9M
Role of endocrine-disrupting chemicals and social stress on perinatal outcomesR00ES019881 · NIEHS · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZOTA, AMI R · 2013 to 2015
$747k
NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES019881NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES026166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major goal of health disparities research is to identify and intervene upon modifiable risk factors that help explain the observed associations between social factors and adverse health outcomes. To this end, statistical methods incorporating mediation analysis have shown promise, as they quantify the contribution of an intermediate variable in an exposure-outcome association. A growing body of literature suggests that environmental chemicals can contribute to health disparities. However, evaluating environmental chemicals as an important component of health disparities introduces methodological complexities that may make standard mediation approaches inadequate. Specific to environmental health is the issue of evaluating both the source and biomarker of the environmental toxicant in order to calculate the proportion of the disparity that would remain had we intervened on the modifiable factors. Recent methodological developments on multiple mediators can improve efforts to integrate both source and biomarker of exposure into epidemiological studies of health disparities. We illustrate a conceptual framework and present how mediation techniques can be used to address environmental health disparities questions. With this, we provide a methodological tool that has the potential to advance this growing field, while simultaneously informing public health prevention and policy surrounding the impact of environmental factors on health disparities.

Indexed as

behaviorbiomarkersenvironmental chemicalsHealth disparitiesmediationracesocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID31531412
PMCPMC6748334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.