Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31531381›Full record

ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2019

Clinical Workflow and Substance Use Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Data in the Electronic Health Records: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network Study.

Li-Tzy Wu, Elizabeth H Payne, Kimberly Roseman, Carla Kingsbury, Ashley Case, Casey Nelson, Robert Lindblad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Li-Tzy WuDuke University School of Medicine, US.ORCID 0000-0002-5909-2259
Elizabeth H PayneThe Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, MD, US.
Kimberly RosemanDuke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University Medical Center, US.
Carla KingsburyDuke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University Medical Center, US.
Ashley CaseThe Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, MD, US.
Casey NelsonThe Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, MD, US.
Robert LindbladThe Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, MD, US.

Funding

Project-003UG1DA040317 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WU, LI-TZY · 2015 to 2019
$9.0M
NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA040317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of electronic health records (EHR) data in research to inform recruitment and outcomes is considered a critical element for pragmatic studies. However, there is a lack of research on the availability of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment data in the EHR to inform research.

methodsThis study recruited providers who used an EHR for patient care and whose facilities were affiliated with the National Institute on Drug Abuse's National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (NIDA CTN). Data about providers' use of an EHR and other methods to support and document clinical tasks for Substance use screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) were collected.

resultsParticipants (n = 26) were from facilities across the country (South 46.2%, West 23.1%, Midwest 19.2 percent, Northeast 11.5 percent), representing 26 different health systems/facilities at various settings: primary care (30.8 percent), ambulatory other/specialty (26.9 percent), mixed setting (11.5 percent), hospital outpatient (11.5 percent), emergency department (7.7 percent), inpatient (3.8 percent), and other (7.7 percent). Validated tools were rarely used for substance use screen and SUD assessment. Structured and unstructured EHR fields were commonly used to document SBIRT. The following tasks had high proportions of using unstructured EHR fields: substance use screen, treatment exploration, brief intervention, referral, and follow-up.

conclusionThis study is the first of its kind to investigate the documentation of SBIRT in the EHR outside of unique settings (e.g., Veterans Health Administration). While results are descriptive, they emphasize the importance of developing EHR features to collect structured data for SBIRT to improve health care quality evaluation and SUD research.

Indexed as

Clinical trials networksubstance use assessmentsubstance use disorder treatmentsubstance use screening

Identifiers

PMID31531381
PMCPMC6676918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.