Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31531228›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2019

Priorities and preferences for school-based mental health services in India: a multi-stakeholder study with adolescents, parents, school staff, and mental health providers.

R Parikh, D Michelson, M Sapru, R Sahu, A Singh, P Cuijpers, V Patel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

R ParikhSangath, C-1/52, 1st Floor, Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0761-5513
D MichelsonSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
M SapruEvalueserve.com Private Limited, Tower 6, 8th Floor, Candor Gurgaon One Realty Projects Pvt. Ltd., IT/ITES SEZ, Candor TechSpace, Tikri, Sector-48, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
R SahuSangath, C-1/52, 1st Floor, Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
A SinghInternational Rescue Committee, No 69/54, Oat Tha Phaya Street, Kyaikkasan Quarter, Bahan Township, Yangon, Myanmar.
P CuijpersDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorstraat 1, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
V PatelSangath, C-1/52, 1st Floor, Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Sangath · INEvalueserve (India) · INHarvard University · USInternational Rescue Committee · ETUniversity of Sussex · GBVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchools are important settings for increasing reach and uptake of adolescent mental health interventions. There is limited consensus on the focus and content of school-based mental health services (SBMHSs), particularly in low-resource settings. This study elicited the views of diverse stakeholders in two urban settings in India about their priorities and preferences for SBMHSs.

methodsWe completed semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with adolescents (

resultsAll stakeholders indicated the need for and acceptability of SBMHSs. Adolescents prioritized resolution of life problems and exhibited a preference for practical guidance. Parents and teachers emphasized functional outcomes and preferred to be involved in interventions. In contrast, adolescents' favored limited involvement from parents and teachers, was related to widespread concerns about confidentiality. Face-to-face counselling was deemed to be the most acceptable delivery format; self-help was less frequently endorsed but was relatively more acceptable if blended with guidance or delivered using digital technology. Structured sensitization was recommended to promote adolescent's engagement. Providers endorsed a stepped care approach to address different levels of mental health need among adolescents.

conclusionSBMHSs are desired by adolescents and adult stakeholders in this setting where few such services exist. Sensitization activities are required to support implementation. School counsellors have an important role in identifying and treating adolescents with different levels of mental health needs, and a suite of interventions is needed to target these needs effectively and efficiently.

Indexed as

AdolescentsIndiaqualitativeschoolsstakeholder analysis

Identifiers

PMID31531228
PMCPMC6737585
OpenAlexW2967341802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.