Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31531083›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR2019

Comparison the Incidence and Severity of Side Effects Profile Of FOLFOX and DCF Regimens in Gastric Cancer Patients.

Ebrahim Salehifar, Razieh Avan, Ghasem Janbabaei, Seyed Khalil Mousavi, Fatemeh Faramarzi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ebrahim SalehifarBoard certified Clinical Pharmacist, Pharmaceutical Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Razieh AvanBoard Certified Pharmacotherapy Specialist, Assistant Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, Medical Toxicology and Drug Abuse Research Center (MTDRC), Faculty of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Ghasem JanbabaeiBoard certified Hematologist Oncologist, Gastrointestinal Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Seyed Khalil MousaviStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Fatemeh FaramarziBoard certified Clinical Pharmacist, Pharmaceutical Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer is the fourth common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Due to lack of adequate information on the side effects of chemotherapy regimens in treatment of gastric cancer, this study was aimed to determine the side effects of two common chemotherapy regimens of gastric cancer. This prospective study was conducted in Emam Khomeini Educational Hospital and Touba Polyclinic; both are affiliated to Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. The frequency and severity of side effects of chemotherapy were recorded based on the National Cancer Institution (NCI) Toxicity Criteria (version 2). DCF (Docetaxel, Cisplatin, 5FU) and FOLFOX (Folinic acid, 5FU, Oxaliplatin) adverse reactions were compared using SPSS 16 software. One hundred twenty five chemotherapy cycles administered to seventy four patients were assessed. The most common used regimens were DCF (70%) and FOLFOX (16%). The incidence of vomiting was higher with DCF compared to FOLFOX (P = 0.049). In more than 50% of cycles, DCF regimen caused diarrhea, while in FOLFOX regimen it was less than 9% (P = 0.002). Stomatitis, visual changes, nausea, skin reactions, and constipation were not significantly different between the two regimens. It seems that the adverse drug reactions of FOLFOX regimen were more favorable than DCF regimen. The results of this study may help clinicians choosing a more favorable chemotherapy regimen especially in patients with a low performance status who have difficulties in tolerating a chemotherapy regimen with a more severe adverse effect profile.

Indexed as

Adverse reactionsChemotherapyDCFFOLFOXGastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID31531083
PMCPMC6706736
OpenAlexW2939578695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.