Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31530999›Full record

ReviewTheScientificWorldJournal2019

Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyond.

Debora F B Leite, Jose G Cecatti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Artificial intelligence in obstetrics.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debora F B LeiteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, School of Medical Sciences, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Jose G CecattiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, School of Medical Sciences, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-8445
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The actual burden and future burden of the small-for-gestational-age (SGA) babies turn their screening in pregnancy a question of major concern for clinicians and policymakers. Half of stillbirths are due to growth restriction

Indexed as

Infant, Small for Gestational AgeBiomarkersFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisPrognosisRiskUltrasonography, PrenatalBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31530999
PMCPMC6721475
OpenAlexW2969816091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.