Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31530868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Bullfrog farms release virulent zoospores of the frog-killing fungus into the natural environment.

Luisa P Ribeiro, Tamilie Carvalho, C Guilherme Becker, Thomas S Jenkinson, Domingos da Silva Leite, Timothy Y James, Sasha E Greenspan, Luís Felipe Toledo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Luisa P RibeiroLaboratório de História Natural de Anfíbios Brasileiros (LaHNAB), Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CEP 13083-862, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. lupribeiro70@gmail.com.
Tamilie CarvalhoLaboratório de História Natural de Anfíbios Brasileiros (LaHNAB), Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CEP 13083-862, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
C Guilherme BeckerDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35487, USA.
Thomas S JenkinsonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Domingos da Silva LeiteDepartamento de Genética, Evolução, Microbiologia e Imunologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CEP 13083-862, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Timothy Y JamesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Sasha E GreenspanDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35487, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8883-2968
Luís Felipe ToledoLaboratório de História Natural de Anfíbios Brasileiros (LaHNAB), Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CEP 13083-862, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4929-9598
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bullfrog farming and trade practices are well-established, globally distributed, and economically valuable, but pose risks for biodiversity conservation. Besides their negative impacts on native amphibian populations as an invasive species, bullfrogs play a key role in spreading the frog-killing fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) in the natural environment. Bullfrogs are tolerant to Bd, meaning that they can carry high infection loads without developing chytridiomycosis. To test the potential of bullfrog farms as reservoirs for diverse and virulent chytrid genotypes, we quantified Bd presence, prevalence and infection loads across approximately 1,500 farmed bullfrogs and in the water that is released from farms into the environment. We also described Bd genotypic diversity within frog farms by isolating Bd from dozens of infected tadpoles. We observed individuals infected with Bd in all sampled farms, with high prevalence (reaching 100%) and high infection loads (average 71,029 zoospore genomic equivalents). Average outflow water volume from farms was high (60,000 L/day), with Bd zoospore concentration reaching approximately 50 million zoospores/L. Because virulent pathogen strains are often selected when growing in tolerant hosts, we experimentally tested whether Bd genotypes isolated from bullfrogs are more virulent in native anuran hosts compared to genotypes isolated from native host species. We genotyped 36 Bd isolates from two genetic lineages and found that Bd genotypes cultured from bullfrogs showed similar virulence in native toads when compared to genotypes isolated from native hosts. Our results indicate that bullfrog farms can harbor high Bd genotypic diversity and virulence and may be contributing to the spread of virulent genotypes in the natural environment. We highlight the urgent need to implement Bd monitoring and mitigation strategies in bullfrog farms to aid in the conservation of native amphibians.

Indexed as

Spores, FungalAnimalsBatrachochytriumCommerceFarmsGenotypeHost-Pathogen InteractionsInternationalityIntroduced SpeciesLarvaMycosesRana catesbeiana

Identifiers

PMID31530868
PMCPMC6748994
OpenAlexW2973425838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.