Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31530867›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2019

Clinical outcomes of an intraoperative surgical margin assessment using the fresh frozen section method in patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery - a single center analysis.

Tomasz Nowikiewicz, Ewa Śrutek, Iwona Głowacka-Mrotek, Magdalena Tarkowska, Agnieszka Żyromska, Wojciech Zegarski

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Virtual Staining of Nonfixed Tissue Histology.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomasz NowikiewiczChair and Department of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum UMK in Bydgoszcz, Prof I. Romanowskiej 2, 85-796, Bydgoszcz, Poland. tomasz.nowikiewicz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-4427
Ewa ŚrutekChair and Department of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum UMK in Bydgoszcz, Prof I. Romanowskiej 2, 85-796, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Iwona Głowacka-MrotekDepartment of Rehabilitation, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum UMK in Bydgoszcz, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-001, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Magdalena TarkowskaDepartment of Laser Therapy and Physiotherapy, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum UMK in Bydgoszcz, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-001, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Agnieszka ŻyromskaChair and Clinic of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Nicolaus Copernicus University Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Prof I. Romanowskiej 2, 85-796, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Wojciech ZegarskiChair and Department of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum UMK in Bydgoszcz, Prof I. Romanowskiej 2, 85-796, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast conserving treatment (BCT) is a safe standard therapeutic method in patients with early invasive breast cancer. However, it is associated with an increased risk of residual neoplastic tissues in surgical margins. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of the use of the intraoperative pathologic analysis by the frozen section (FS) method for evaluation of the extent of the primary lumpectomy. The study concerns a retrospective analysis of a group of 1102 patients who underwent BCT between Jan 2015 and Dec 2016. The assessment focused on the frequency of the intraoperative pathologic analysis of the primary lumpectomy extent (fresh frozen section method). The influence of the BCT specimen analysis method on the free margins width, as well as the rate and the cause of reoperation were evaluated. The intraoperative lumpectomy evaluation was performed in 45.8% (505/1102) of patients (Group I), while in the remaining 54.2% of the cases it was decided to abandon this procedure (Group II). Although in 72 (14.3%) patients the intraoperative analysis gave negative results, the margins contained residual tumor tissue (vs. 16.9% in Group II). In Group I, conversion from the previously planned BCT to mastectomy was necessary in 5.9% (30/505) patients (vs. 9.7% in Group II). The duration of surgery was 48.9 ± 17.3 minutes (Group I) and 42.9 ± 13.6 minutes (Group II). In patients undergoing BCT, the use of the intraoperative pathologic analysis by the FS method resulted in a reduction of the total number of reoperations performed due to residual tumor found in the margins following the primary lumpectomy. However, it statistically significantly extended the duration of the surgery.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFrozen SectionsHumansIntraoperative CareLymph Node ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOperative TimeReoperationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31530867
PMCPMC6748937
OpenAlexW2973940397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.