ReviewClinical endoscopy2020
Endoscopic Transmural Necrosectomy: Timing, Indications, and Methods.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Endoscopic Management of Benign Pancreaticobiliary Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Postponed endoscopic necrosectomy results in a lower rate of additional intervention for infected walled-off necrosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Endoscopic therapies for walled-off necrosis.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023Article
- Management of pancreatic fluid collections.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022Review
- Long-term Outcomes of Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy for Complicated or Symptomatic Walled-Off Necrosis: A Korean Multicenter Study.Gut and liver · 2021Article
- Multiple hidden vessels in walled-off necrosis with high-risk bleeding: Report of two cases.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- GRUPUGE Perspective: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Peripancreatic Collections.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Endoscopic Detorsion Results in Sigmoid Volvulus: Single-Center Experience.Emergency medicine international · 2020Article
- Controversies in EUS-guided treatment of walled-off necrosis.Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
- Safety and efficacy of the EndoRotor device for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis after EUS-guided cystenterostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Walled-off necrosis is considered one of the most severe complications after an episode of severe acute pancreatitis. Traditionally, percutaneous drainage is selected as the first treatment step, while open surgery can be planned as a secondary option if necrosectomy is required. In recent years, endoscopic necrosectomy has evolved as a more favorable approach. To date, a step-up treatment strategy is recommended, particularly when a plastic stent is selected as the drainage device. Multi-gateway endoscopic therapy may be used in a step-up fashion if only one stent fails to clear debris. Over many years, there has been an evolution in stent selection, from plastic to metallic stents. Within a few years of its clinical usage, lumen-apposing stents are gaining more popularity as they offer direct endoscopic necrosectomy and only require a few sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.