Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31530739›Full record

ArticleGut and liver2020

Simple Noninvasive Scores Are Clinically Useful to Exclude, Not Predict, Advanced Fibrosis: A Study in Turkish Patients with Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Eda Kaya, Alev Bakir, Haluk Tarik Kani, Coskun Ozer Demirtas, Caglayan Keklikkiran, Yusuf Yilmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut and liver, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The egyptian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Suboptimal reliability of FIB-4 and NAFLD-fibrosis scores for staging of liver fibrosis in general population.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eda KayaCerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9293-2811
Alev BakirDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Halic University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0664-5822
Haluk Tarik KaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0042-9256
Coskun Ozer DemirtasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0004-2740
Caglayan KeklikkiranDepartment of Gastroenterology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6304-5554
Yusuf YilmazDepartment of Gastroenterology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4518-5283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Advanced fibrosis (F≥3) indicates poor outcomes in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Here, we examined the diagnostic performance of the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) for detecting (or excluding) advanced fibrosis in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Methods: The diagnostic performance of each noninvasive test according to previously identified cutoff points indicating low and high risk for advanced fibrosis was determined in 463 patients with NAFLD. Patients who scored <1.3 and >2.67 on the FIB-4 were considered at low and high risk for advanced fibrosis, respectively. Patients who scored <-1.455 and >0.676 on the NFS were considered at low and high risk for advanced fibrosis, respectively. Results: Eighty-one patients (17.5%) had biopsy-proven advanced fibrosis (F≥3). The published FIB-4 cutoff values for low and high risk were able to exclude advanced fibrosis with negative predictive values (NPVs) of 0.907 and 0.843 and specificities of 74% and 97%, respectively. The published NFS cutoff values for low and high risk were able to exclude advanced fibrosis with NPVs of 0.913 and 0.842 and specificities of 63% and 96%, respectively. If biopsies were performed in only patients with a FIB-4 above the low cutoff point (≥1.3), 67.1% could be avoided. Conversely, if biopsies were performed in only patients with an NFS above the low cutoff point (≥-1.455), 57.0% could be avoided. Conclusions: The main clinical utility of the FIB-4 and NFS in patients with NAFLD lies in the ability to exclude, not identify, advanced fibrosis.

Indexed as

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseAdultAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBiopsyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesDiagnostic testLiver fibrosisNon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseSensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

PMID31530739
PMCPMC7366150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.