Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31530636›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection.

Katja R Kasimatis, Peter L Ralph, Patrick C Phillips

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A century of theories of balancing selection.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The battle of the sexes in humans is highly polygenic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Sexual antagonism in sequential hermaphrodites.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Searching for signatures of sexually antagonistic selection on stickleback sex chromosomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katja R KasimatisInstitute of Ecology and Evolution and k.kasimatis@utoronto.ca.
Peter L RalphInstitute of Ecology and Evolution and.ORCID 0000-0002-9459-6866
Patrick C PhillipsInstitute of Ecology and Evolution and.ORCID 0000-0001-7271-342X
University of Oregon · US

Funding

Graduate Training in Genetics Administrative Supplement - Career Curriculum DevelopmentT32GM007413 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI GUILLEMIN, KAREN J · 1985 to 2022
$7.8M
Systems genetics of natural variation in stress response pathwaysR01GM102511 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PHILLIPS, PATRICK C. · 2015 to 2018
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102511NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the autosomal genome is shared between the sexes, sex-specific fitness optima present an evolutionary challenge. While sexually antagonistic selection might favor different alleles within females and males, segregation randomly reassorts alleles at autosomal loci between sexes each generation. This process of homogenization during transmission thus prevents between-sex allelic divergence generated by sexually antagonistic selection from accumulating across multiple generations. However, recent empirical studies have reported high male-female

Indexed as

Models, GeneticSelection, GeneticSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleGenomeHumansMaleantagonistic selectiongenetic loadintersexual FSTmale-female divergencesexual conflict

Identifiers

PMID31530636
PMCPMC6829153
OpenAlexW2974061978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.