Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31530620›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Supporting the provision of pharmacy medication reviews to marginalised (medically underserved) groups: a before/after questionnaire study investigating the impact of a patient-professional co-produced digital educational intervention.

Asam Latif, Justin Waring, Li-Chia Chen, Kristian Pollock, Josie Solomon, Nargis Gulzar, Sulma Gulzar, Emma Anderson, Shahida Choudhary, Nasa Abbasi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Asam LatifSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK Asam.Latif@nottingham.ac.uk.
Justin WaringHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Li-Chia ChenDepartment of Biomolecular Science, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, UK.
Kristian PollockSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Josie SolomonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Nargis GulzarSchool of Pharmacy, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Sulma GulzarThe Westgate Practice, South East Staffordshire and Seisdon Peninsular CCG, Staffordshire, UK.
Emma AndersonCentre for Pharmacy Postgraduate Education (CPPE), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Shahida ChoudharySchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Nasa AbbasiQueen's Pharmacy Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Heather J WharradSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6030-5648
Claire AndersonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

Department of Health ICA-CL-2015-01-008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPeople who are marginalised (medically underserved) experience significant health disparities and their voices are often 'seldom heard'. Interventions to improve professional awareness and engagement with these groups are urgently needed. This study uses a co-production approach to develop an online digital educational intervention in order to improve pharmacy staffs' intention to offer a community pharmacy medication review service to medically underserved groups.

designBefore/after (3 months) self-completion online questionnaire.

settingCommunity pharmacies in the Nottinghamshire (England) geographical area.

participantsCommunity pharmacy staff.

interventionOnline digital educational intervention. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was 'behaviour change intention' using a validated 12-item survey measure. The secondary outcome measure was pharmacist self-reported recruitment of underserved groups to the medication review service.

resultsAll pharmacies in the Nottinghamshire area (n=237) were approached in June 2017 and responses were received from 149 staff (from 122 pharmacies). At 3 months (after completing the baseline questionnaire), 96 participants (from 80 pharmacies) completed a follow-up questionnaire, of which two-thirds (n=62) reported completing the e-learning. A before/after comparison analysis found an improving trend in all the five constructs of behaviour change intention (intention, social influence, beliefs about capabilities, moral norms and beliefs about consequences), with a significant increase in mean score of participants' 'beliefs about capabilities' (0.44; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.76, p=0.009). In the short-term, no significant change was detected in the number of patients being offered and the patient completing a medication review.

conclusionsAlthough increases in the numbers of patients being offered a medication review was not detected, the intervention has the potential to significantly improve pharmacy professionals' 'beliefs about capabilities' in the short-term. Wider organisational and policy barriers to engagement with marginasied groups may need to be addressed. Future research should focus on the interplay between digital learning and practice to better identify and understand effective practice change pathways.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity Pharmacy ServicesDrug Utilization ReviewEducation, ProfessionalEnglandFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMedically Underserved AreaMedication AdherencePatient Education as TopicProfessional RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesBehaviour change intentionCo-productionDigital educational interventionmedically underservedPharmacy Medicines Use Review (MUR)

Identifiers

PMID31530620
PMCPMC6756439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.