Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31530611›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Comparing docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) concomitant with neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in the treatment of breast cancer (DHA WIN): protocol of a double-blind, phase II, randomised controlled trial.

Marnie Newell, John R Mackey, Gilbert Bigras, Mirey Alvarez-Camacho, Susan Goruk, Sunita Ghosh, Alison Schmidt, Deborah Miede, Ann Chisotti, Lynne Postovit and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03831178 (Docosahexaenoic Acid), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03831178 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) for Women With Breast Cancer in the Neoadjuvant Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorAHS Cancer Control AlbertaRan2019 to 2030Enrolled76ConditionsBreast CancerArmsDocosahexaenoic acid (DHA), Placebo oral capsule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. DHA and Cancer: The Uncharted Territory of Nutritional Oncology.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marnie NewellDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
John R MackeyDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Gilbert BigrasDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Mirey Alvarez-CamachoAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Susan GorukDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sunita GhoshAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Alison SchmidtAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Deborah MiedeAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ann ChisottiAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lynne PostovitDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Kristi BakerDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Vera MazurakDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Kerry CourneyaFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Richard BerendtDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Wei-Feng DongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
George WoodDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sanraj K BasiAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Anil Abraham JoyDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Karen KingAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Judith Meza-JuncoAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Xiaofu ZhuAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Catherine FieldDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada catherine.field@ualberta.ca.
University of Alberta · CAAlberta Health Services · CA

Funding

CIHR RES0037745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer treatment is prescribed to facilitate surgery and provide confirmation of drug-sensitive disease, and the achievement of pathological complete response (pCR) predicts improved long-term outcomes. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) has been shown to reduce tumour growth in preclinical models when combined with chemotherapy and is known to beneficially modulate systemic immune function. The purpose of this trial is to investigate the benefit of DHA supplementation in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a double-blind, phase II, randomised controlled trial of 52 women prescribed neoadjuvant chemotherapy to test if DHA supplementation enhances chemotherapy efficacy. The DHA supplementation group will take 4.4 g/day DHA orally, and the placebo group will take an equal fat supplement of vegetable oil. The primary outcome will be change in Ki67 labelling index from prechemotherapy core needle biopsy to definitive surgical specimen. The secondary endpoints include assessment of (1) DHA plasma phospholipid content; (2) systemic immune cell types, plasma cytokines and inflammatory markers; (3) tumour markers for apoptosis and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes; (4) rate of pCR in breast and in axillary nodes; (5) frequency of grade 3 and 4 chemotherapy-associated toxicities; and (6) patient-perceived quality of life. The trial has 81% power to detect a significant between-group difference in Ki67 index with a two-sided t-test of less than 0.0497, and accounts for 10% dropout rate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has full approval from the Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta - Cancer Committee (Protocol #: HREBA.CC-18-0381). We expect to present the findings of this study to the scientific community in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences. The results of this study will provide evidence for supplementing with DHA during neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03831178.

Indexed as

AlbertaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicCytokinesDietary SupplementsDocosahexaenoic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenLymph NodesNeoadjuvant TherapyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkers, TumorCytokinesDocosahexaenoic AcidsKi-67 Antigenapoptosisfatty acidsimmune functionKi67omega-3phospholipidsproliferation

Identifiers

PMID31530611
PMCPMC6756327
OpenAlexW2974602850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.