Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31530610›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Interventions across the retirement transition for improving well-being: a scoping review protocol.

Miriam Rodríguez-Monforte, Carles Fernández-Jané, Anna Martin-Arribas, Mercè Sitjà-Rabert, Olga Canet Vélez, Montserrat Sanromà-Ortiz, Jordi Vilaró, Elena Carrillo-Alvarez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Interventions across the Retirement Transition for Improving Well-Being: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miriam Rodríguez-MonforteGlobal Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Universitat Ramon Llull - Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain.
Carles Fernández-JanéGlobal Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Universitat Ramon Llull - Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna Martin-ArribasGlobal Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Universitat Ramon Llull - Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain.
Mercè Sitjà-RabertGlobal Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Universitat Ramon Llull - Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain.
Olga Canet VélezGlobal Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Universitat Ramon Llull - Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain.
Montserrat Sanromà-OrtizGlobal Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Universitat Ramon Llull - Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi VilaróGlobal Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Universitat Ramon Llull - Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain.
Elena Carrillo-AlvarezGlobal Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Universitat Ramon Llull - Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain elenaca@blanquerna.url.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe work-to-retirement transition involves a process of psychologically and behaviourally distancing oneself from the workforce that is often accompanied by other social changes. The person is confronted with new social roles, expectations, challenges and opportunities that can influence lifestyle and well-being. In the scientific literature, we find recent reports of interventions aimed at improving health and well-being in people at retirement age. However, there is still a gap of knowledge on how different interventions during retirement might improve health status. We intend to conduct a scoping review with the aim of describing interventions for improving well-being across the retirement transition. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The methodological framework described by Arksey and O'Malley; the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines as well as the Preferred Reporting Items for scoping reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols statements will be followed. Eligibility criteria comprise of: (a) all type of original studies, review articles or reports published on journals as well as grey literature; (b) describing interventions to improve the well-being in adults across their retirement transition; (c) including participants before, during and after retirement; (d) all publications must describe variables associated with participants' physical and/or psychological and/or social well-being and/or perceived quality of life related to these; (e) no language restriction and (f) published from January 2000 to March 2019. The main findings will be summarised using a narrative descriptive synthesis approach and grouped following the population, concept and context principles. A stakeholder meeting will be held to provide feedback on the findings and to develop next steps in research and practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval from a research ethics committee is not required, as no personal information will be collected. We plan to disseminate our research findings at different levels: scientific community, clinical and social arenas, as well as to healthcare leaders and policymakers and general population. The project has been registered at Open Science Framework with the name TRANSITS: work to retirement transition project.

Indexed as

Health StatusLife StyleQuality of LifeRetirementAgedHumansPolicyResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicresearch protocolretirementscoping reviewtransitionwell-being

Identifiers

PMID31530610
PMCPMC6756433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.