ArticleBMC medicine2019
The case for a universal hepatitis C vaccine to achieve hepatitis C elimination.
Article in BMC medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Cost-benefit analysis of a potential hepatitis C vaccine: a modelling study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- The development of a pan-genotypic T cell vaccine against hepatitis C virus using heterologous prime-boost strategies.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Article
- Plasma levels of soluble PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3 and galectin-3 and the degree of liver fibrosis in CHC and the impact of successful antiviral treatment on their levels.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Vaccines for cancer prevention: exploring opportunities and navigating challenges.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2025Review
- Epitope-focused immunogens targeting the hepatitis C virus glycoproteins induce broadly neutralizing antibodies.Science advances · 2024Article
- [Development approaches for vaccines against hepatitis C virus infections].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022Review
- Hepatitis C virus: A critical approach to who really needs treatment.World journal of hepatology · 2022Review
- Hepatitis C Vaccination: Where We Are and Where We Need to Be.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Towards a Systems Immunology Approach to Understanding Correlates of Protective Immunity against HCV.Viruses · 2021Review
- Review
- Partial restoration of immune response in Hepatitis C patients after viral clearance by direct-acting antiviral therapy.PloS one · 2021Article
- Mass spectrometric based detection of protein nucleotidylation in the RNA polymerase of SARS-CoV-2.Communications chemistry · 2021Article
- Comparison of double antigen sandwich and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus antibodies.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe introduction of highly effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C has led to calls to eliminate it as a public health threat through treatment-as-prevention. Recent studies suggest it is possible to develop a vaccine to prevent hepatitis C. Using a mathematical model, we examined the potential impact of a hepatitis C vaccine on the feasibility and cost of achieving the global WHO elimination target of an 80% reduction in incidence by 2030 in the era of DAA treatment.
methodsThe model was calibrated to 167 countries and included two population groups (people who inject drugs (PWID) and the general community), features of the care cascade, and the coverage of health systems to deliver services. Projections were made for 2018-2030.
resultsThe optimal incidence reduction strategy was to implement test and treat programmes among PWID, and in settings with high levels of community transmission undertake screening and treatment of the general population. With a vaccine available, the optimal strategy was to include vaccination within test and treat programmes, in addition to vaccinating adolescents in settings with high levels of community transmission. Of the 167 countries modelled, between 0 and 48 could achieve an 80% reduction in incidence without a vaccine. This increased to 15-113 countries if a 75% efficacious vaccine with a 10-year duration of protection were available. If a vaccination course cost US$200, vaccine use reduced the cost of elimination for 66 countries (40%) by an aggregate of US$7.4 (US$6.6-8.2) billion. For a US$50 per course vaccine, this increased to a US$9.8 (US$8.7-10.8) billion cost reduction across 78 countries (47%).
conclusionsThese findings strongly support the case for hepatitis C vaccine development as an urgent public health need, to ensure hepatitis C elimination is achievable and at substantially reduced costs for a majority of countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.