ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2020
Impact of movement and motion-artefact correction on image quality and interpretability in CBCT units with aligned and lateral-offset detectors.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Head motion and perception of discomfort by young children during simulated CBCT examinations.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Trial
- What Drives Metal Artifacts in CBCT? A Comparative Study of Detector Types and Metallic Object Configurations.Radiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Effect of a Motion Artifact Correction System on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image Characteristics.Cureus · 2023Article
- Dental imaging using an ultra-high resolution photon-counting CT system.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Diagnosis of cracked teeth using cone-beam computed tomography: literature review and clinical experience.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Review
- Objective assessment of the combined effect of exomass-related- and motion artefacts in cone beam CT.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Article
- Head motion during cone-beam computed tomography: Analysis of frequency and influence on image quality.Imaging science in dentistry · 2020Article
- Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective Study.Journal of oral & maxillofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the impact of movement and motion-artefact correction systems on CBCT image quality and interpretability of simulated diagnostic tasks for aligned and lateral-offset detectors.
methodsA human skull simulating three diagnostic tasks (implant planning in the anterior maxilla, implant planning in the left-side-mandible and mandibular molar furcation assessment in the right-side-mandible) was mounted on a robot performing six movement types. Four CBCT units were used: Cranex 3Dx (CRA), Ortophos SL (ORT), Promax 3D Mid (PRO), and X1. Protocols were tested with aligned (CRA, ORT, PRO, and X1) and lateral-offset (CRA and PRO) detectors and two motion-artefact correction systems (PRO and X1). Movements were performed at one moment-in-time (t
resultsInterobserver agreement was substantial for all parameters (0.66-0.68). For aligned detectors, in all diagnostic tasks a motion-artefact correction system influenced image interpretability. For lateral-offset detectors, the interpretability varied according to the unit and moment-in-time, in which the movement was performed. PRO motion-artefact correction system was less effective for the offset detector than its aligned counterpart.
conclusionMotion-artefact correction systems enhanced image quality and interpretability for units with aligned detectors but were less effective for those with lateral-offset detectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.