Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529767›Full record

Trial reportBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2020

Association of the eukaryotic vaginal virome with prophylactic antibiotic exposure and reproductive outcomes in a subfertile population undergoing in vitro fertilisation: a prospective exploratory study.

A M Eskew, M J Stout, B S Bedrick, J K Riley, K R Omurtag, P T Jimenez, R R Odem, V S Ratts, S L Keller, E S Jungheim and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics prior to or at the time of embryo transfer in ART.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A M EskewDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
M J StoutDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
B S BedrickDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
J K RileyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
K R OmurtagDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
P T JimenezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
R R OdemDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
V S RattsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
S L KellerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
E S JungheimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
K M WylieDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USJames S. McDonnell Foundation · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Reproductive Epidemiology Training Program at Washington University in St. LouisT32HD055172 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, TESSA · 2009 to 2018
$2.5M
Children's Discovery Institute of Washington UniversityNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health T32HD055172NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD055172NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) UL1TR002345St Louis Children's HospitalWashington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to use high-throughput sequencing to describe the vaginal eukaryotic DNA virome in patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) to examine associations between the vaginal virome, antibiotic exposure and IVF outcomes.

designProspective exploratory study.

settingSingle academic fertility centre. POPULATION: Subfertile women age 18-43 years undergoing their first IVF cycle with a fresh embryo transfer.

methodsThe primary exposure was prophylactic azithromycin or no azithromycin before IVF. A mid-vaginal swab was obtained at the time of embryo transfer for virome analysis.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcomes compared between exposure groups were characteristics of vaginal virome and clinical pregnancy rates. Secondary outcomes were virome associations with number of oocytes retrieved, number of blastocysts and implantation rate.

resultsTwenty-six women contributed a vaginal swab before embryo transfer. There were no significant differences in IVF outcomes between azithromycin groups. There was no association between viral diversity and clinical pregnancy overall. A higher diversity of herpesviruses and α-papillomaviruses was observed in samples from the azithromycin-treated group compared with the no azithromycin group (P = 0.04). In women that received azithromycin, viral diversity was higher in the group that did not achieve clinical pregnancy compared with those who did (P = 0.06).

conclusionsWe demonstrate that the vaginal eukaryotic virome in women undergoing IVF is associated with antibiotic exposure. Additionally, we demonstrate an inverse trend between viral diversity and pregnancy, with a higher number of viruses detected associated with failure to achieve clinical pregnancy in the azithromycin group. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Higher viral diversity is associated with prophylactic antibiotic exposure in subfertile women undergoing IVF.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroMicrobiotaAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, ViralEmbryo TransferEukaryotaFemaleHerpesviridaeHumansInfertilityPapillomaviridaePregnancyProspective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, ViralRNA, Ribosomal, 16SEmbryo transferin vitro fertilisationreproductive tract microbiomevaginal virusvirome

Identifiers

PMID31529767
PMCPMC6910962
OpenAlexW2973608439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.