ArticleBiometrics2020
A Bayesian approach to joint modeling of matrix-valued imaging data and treatment outcome with applications to depression studies.
Article in Biometrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05025787 (EN20-01), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
EN20-01: A 24 Week Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CNTX-6970 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Knee Osteoarthritis Pain.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bayesian Causal Model for Matrix-Valued Exposures With Applications to Radiotherapy Planning.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- LOW-RANK LONGITUDINAL FACTOR REGRESSION WITH APPLICATION TO CHEMICAL MIXTURES.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
- Bayesian scalar-on-network regression with applications to brain functional connectivity.Biometrics · 2025Article
- Influence and interaction of resting state functional magnetic resonance and tryptophan hydroxylase-2 methylation on short-term antidepressant drug response.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Balancing Inferential Integrity and Disclosure Risk via Model Targeted Masking and Multiple Imputation.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2022Article
- Recent Studies on Anti-Depressant Bioactive Substances in Selected Species from the GeneraPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a unified Bayesian joint modeling framework for studying association between a binary treatment outcome and a baseline matrix-valued predictor. Specifically, a joint modeling approach relating an outcome to a matrix-valued predictor through a probabilistic formulation of multilinear principal component analysis is developed. This framework establishes a theoretical relationship between the outcome and the matrix-valued predictor, although the predictor is not explicitly expressed in the model. Simulation studies are provided showing that the proposed method is superior or competitive to other methods, such as a two-stage approach and a classical principal component regression in terms of both prediction accuracy and estimation of association; its advantage is most notable when the sample size is small and the dimensionality in the imaging covariate is large. Finally, our proposed joint modeling approach is shown to be a very promising tool in an application exploring the association between baseline electroencephalography data and a favorable response to treatment in a depression treatment study by achieving a substantial improvement in prediction accuracy in comparison to competing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.