Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529644›Full record

ArticleClinical oral implants research2020

DBBM shows no signs of resorption under inflammatory conditions. An experimental study in the mouse calvaria.

Ulrike Kuchler, Gabriel Mulinari Dos Santos, Patrick Heimel, Alexandra Stähli, Franz Josef Strauss, Stefan Tangl, Reinhard Gruber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ulrike KuchlerDepartment of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gabriel Mulinari Dos SantosDepartment of Oral Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Araçatuba Dental School, Araçatuba, Brazil.
Patrick HeimelCore Facility Hard Tissue and Biomaterial Research, Karl Donath Laboratory, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra StähliDepartment of Oral Biology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5631-3300
Franz Josef StraussDepartment of Oral Biology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-7327
Stefan TanglCore Facility Hard Tissue and Biomaterial Research, Karl Donath Laboratory, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9023-4745
Reinhard GruberDepartment of Oral Biology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5400-9009
Medical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Bern · CHAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration · ATLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA · ATUniversity of Chile · CL

Funding

Austrian Science Fund 4072-B28Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4072Osteology Foundation 14-126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDeproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) is not resorbable. However, the behavior of DBBM under inflammatory conditions remains unclear. Aim of the study was therefore to evaluate the resorption of DBBM under local inflammatory conditions in vivo using the calvarial osteolysis model.

methodsIn thirty adult BALB/c mice, DBBM was implanted into the space between the elevated soft tissue and the calvarial bone. Inflammation was induced either by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) injection or by polyethylene particles (Ceridust) mixed with DBBM. Three modalities were randomly applied (n = 10 each): (a) DBBM alone (control), (b) DBBM + LPS, and (c) DBBM + polyethylene particles (Ceridust). Mice were euthanized on day fourteen, and each calvarium was subjected to histological and µCT analysis. Primary outcome was the size distribution of the DBBM particles. Secondary outcome was the surface erosion of the calvarial bone.

resultsHistological and µCT analysis revealed that the size distribution and the volume of DBBM particles in the augmented site were similar between DBBM alone and the combinations with LPS or polyethylene particles. Moreover, histological evaluation showed no signs of erosions of DBBM particles under inflammatory conditions. µCT analysis and histology further revealed that LPS and the polyethylene particles, but not the DBBM alone, caused severe erosions of the calvarial bone as indicated by large voids representing the massive compensatory new immature woven bone formation on the endosteal surface.

conclusionsLocal calvarial bone but not the DBBM particles undergo severe resorption and subsequent new bone formation under inflammatory conditions in a mouse model.

Indexed as

Bone SubstitutesAnimalsBone RegenerationCattleDisease Models, AnimalMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMineralsSkullBone SubstitutesMineralsbone regenerationbone substitutescalvariainflammationmiceosteoclasts

Identifiers

PMID31529644
PMCPMC7003744
OpenAlexW2974674515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.