Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529622›Full record

Trial reportHeadache2019

Onset of Efficacy Following Oral Treatment With Lasmiditan for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Integrated Results From 2 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Clinical Studies.

Messoud Ashina, Raghavendra Vasudeva, Leah Jin, Louise Lombard, Elizabeth Gray, Erin G Doty, Laura Yunes-Medina, Kraig S Kinchen, Cristina Tassorelli

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Headache, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The 5-HTNature reviews. Neurology · 2023
    Review
  8. Meningeal Mechanisms and the Migraine Connection.Annual review of neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Lasmiditan: Acute Migraine Treatment Without Vasoconstriction. A Review.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The potential of lasmiditan in migraine.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Messoud AshinaDanish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6218-4744
Raghavendra VasudevaLilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Leah JinCovance Chiltern, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Louise LombardLilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Elizabeth GrayEli Lilly Canada Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Erin G DotyLilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Laura Yunes-MedinaLilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kraig S KinchenLilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Cristina TassorelliHeadache Science Centre, IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USCovance (United States) · USEli Lilly (Canada) · CAUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo expand on available information on the efficacy of oral lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine with particular focus on the timing of the effect and on its impact on migraine-associated symptoms.

backgroundLasmiditan is a novel selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 1F receptor agonist that lacks vasoconstrictive activity. In 2 phase 3 studies, SAMURAI and SPARTAN, lasmiditan met primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints at 2 hours following initial dose.

methodsIntegrated analyses were completed from 2 phase 3 clinical trials, SPARTAN and SAMURAI. Baseline data and data collected every 30 minutes up to 2 hours after taking lasmiditan (50, 100, or 200 mg) or placebo were analyzed to determine the onset of efficacy. A total of 5236 patients were randomized to be treated with placebo (N = 1493), lasmiditan 50 mg (N = 750), lasmiditan 100 mg (N = 1498), or lasmiditan 200 mg (N = 1495). Data were analyzed to determine the onset of improvement for the following efficacy measures: pain freedom, most bothersome symptom freedom, pain relief, freedom from associated individual symptoms (photophobia, phonophobia, or nausea), total migraine freedom (defined as pain freedom and freedom from associated symptoms), and freedom from migraine-related functional disability. Time to meaningful headache relief and time to first become pain free were also analyzed.

resultsSignificantly higher rates of pain freedom (100 mg, 10.0%, P = .012; 200 mg, 15.5%, P < .001; Placebo, 7.0%) and total migraine freedom (100 mg, 8.9%, P = .017; 200 mg, 12.4%, P < .001; Placebo, 6.1%) were achieved starting at 60 minutes in 100- and 200-mg lasmiditan-treated groups compared with placebo group. Rates of freedom from most bothersome symptom (100 mg, 11.1%, P = .015; 200 mg, 13.0%, P < .001; Placebo, 7.9%), and pain relief (100 mg, 17.5%, P = .007; 200 mg, 19.1%, P < .001; Placebo, 13.4%) were significantly higher starting as early as 30 minutes in lasmiditan 100- and 200-mg lasmiditan-treated groups. A significantly higher percentage of patients in the 200-mg lasmiditan-treated group achieved freedom from photophobia (13.7%, P = .005; Placebo, 9.2%) and phonophobia (17.4%, P = .042; Placebo, 13.4%) starting at 30 minutes. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the 200-mg lasmiditan-treated group achieved freedom from migraine-related functional disability starting at 60 minutes (16.4%, P < .001; Placebo, 11.1%). All efficacy measures, except for freedom from nausea, were statistically significant after lasmiditan treatment (50, 100, or 200 mg) compared with placebo at 90 and 120 minutes. Finally, patients taking lasmiditan had a higher likelihood of achieving meaningful headache relief and becoming headache pain free within 24 hours compared with those taking placebo (P < .001).

conclusionsPatients treated with lasmiditan for a migraine attack reported an earlier onset of efficacy compared with those treated with placebo. Some of the efficacy measures such as pain relief demonstrated improvement as early as the first assessment at 30 minutes after 100- or 200-mg lasmiditan treatment.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultBenzamidesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersPiperidinesPyridinesSerotonin Receptor AgonistsTreatment OutcomeBenzamideslasmiditanPiperidinesPyridinesSerotonin Receptor Agonistsacute treatmentditan classlasmiditanmigraineonset of efficacyonset of response

Identifiers

PMID31529622
PMCPMC6899640
OpenAlexW2974314845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.