Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529604›Full record

Trial reportMolecular oncology2019

Prospective detection of mutations in cerebrospinal fluid, pleural effusion, and ascites of advanced cancer patients to guide treatment decisions.

Sergio Villatoro, Clara Mayo-de-Las-Casas, Núria Jordana-Ariza, Santiago Viteri-Ramírez, Mónica Garzón-Ibañez, Irene Moya-Horno, Beatriz García-Peláez, María González-Cao, Umberto Malapelle, Ariadna Balada-Bel and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Liquid Biopsy in Solid Tumours: An Overview.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergio VillatoroLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6940-2866
Clara Mayo-de-Las-CasasLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Núria Jordana-ArizaLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Santiago Viteri-RamírezDr Rosell Oncology Institute, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Mónica Garzón-IbañezLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Irene Moya-HornoDr Rosell Oncology Institute, General Hospital of Catalonia, Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain.
Beatriz García-PeláezLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
María González-CaoDr Rosell Oncology Institute, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Umberto MalapelleDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.
Ariadna Balada-BelLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandro Martínez-BuenoDr Rosell Oncology Institute, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Raquel CamposLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Noemí ReguartDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Margarita MajemMedical Oncology Service, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Remei BlancoMedical Oncology Service, Hospital de Terrassa, Spain.
Ana BlascoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Spain.
María J CatalánLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier GonzálezDr Rosell Oncology Institute, General Hospital of Catalonia, Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain.
Giancarlo TronconeDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.
Niki KarachaliouLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Rafael RosellLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Miguel A Molina-VilaLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8866-9881
Hospital Universitario Dexeus · ESInstituto Oncológico Dr. Rosell · ESFederico II University Hospital · ITHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital General Universitario De Valencia · ESHospital Terrassa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many advanced cases of cancer show central nervous system, pleural, or peritoneal involvement. In this study, we prospectively analyzed if cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), pleural effusion (PE), and/or ascites (ASC) can be used to detect driver mutations and guide treatment decisions. We collected 42 CSF, PE, and ASC samples from advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and melanoma patients. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was purified and driver mutations analyzed and quantified by PNA-Q-PCR or next-generation sequencing. All 42 fluid samples were evaluable; clinically relevant mutations were detected in 41 (97.6%). Twenty-three fluids had paired blood samples, 22 were mutation positive in fluid but only 14 in blood, and the abundance of the mutant alleles was significantly higher in fluids. Of the 34 fluids obtained at progression to different therapies, EGFR resistance mutations were detected in nine and ALK acquired mutations in two. The results of testing of CSF, PE, and ASC were used to guide treatment decisions, such as initiation of osimertinib treatment or selection of specific ALK tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. In conclusion, fluids close to metastatic sites are superior to blood for the detection of relevant mutations and can offer valuable clinical information, particularly in patients progressing to targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Anaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAscitic FluidLung NeoplasmsMutationNeoplasm ProteinsPleural Effusion, MalignantAcrylamidesAgedAniline CompoundsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsFemaleHT29 CellsHumansIndolesMaleAcrylamidesALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAniline CompoundsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIndolesNeoplasm ProteinsosimertinibPyrimidinesascitescell-free DNAcerebrospinal fluidliquid biopsypleural effusionsolid tumorssomatic mutations

Identifiers

PMID31529604
PMCPMC6887582
OpenAlexW2974304466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.