Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529598›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Inclusion of pregnant women in antiretroviral drug research: what is needed to move forwards?

Lee Fairlie, Catriona Waitt, Shahin Lockman, Michelle Moorhouse, Elaine J Abrams, Polly Clayden, Marta Boffito, Saye Khoo, Helen Rees, Amandine Cournil and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Pregnancy and medicines: time for paradigm change.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Lee FairlieWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5327-1734
Catriona WaittDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Shahin LockmanBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Michelle MoorhouseWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Elaine J AbramsICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health and Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Polly ClaydenHIV i-Base, London, UK.
Marta BoffitoChelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
Saye KhooDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Helen ReesWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Amandine CournilUnité Mixte Internationale 233, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, U1175-INSERM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6172-4761
Willem Francois VenterWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Celicia SerenataWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Matthew ChersichWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of Liverpool · GBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBColumbia University · USInserm · FR

Funding

Mentoring in Patient-Oriented HIV Research in the Era of Universal ARTK24AI131928 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHAHIN LOCKMAN · 2017 to 2026
$1.9M
Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT104422MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo adequately ascertain drug safety and efficacy, drug trials need to include participants from all groups likely to receive the medication following approval. Pregnant women, however, are mostly excluded from trials, and women participating are often required to use highly effective contraception and taken off study product (even off study) if they conceive. There is little commercial incentive for including pregnant women in clinical trials, even when preclinical animal and human pharmacokinetic and safety data appear reassuring. With this conservative approach, large numbers of pregnant women are exposed to drug postlicensing with little known about drug safety and efficacy, and little done to systematically monitor outcomes of pregnancy exposure. DISCUSSION: The article focuses on antiretrovirals for treating and preventing HIV, and presents potential approaches which could extend to other therapeutic areas, to obtaining adequate and timely data to inform use of these drugs in this population. Most importantly the pregnancy risk profile of investigational agents can be systematically stratified from low to high risk, based on guidelines from regulatory bodies. This stratification can determine the progress through preclinical work with animals and non-pregnant women to opportunistic studies among women who become pregnant on a clinical trial or within routine clinical treatment. Stratification can include pregnant women in clinical trials, concurrent with Phase II/III trials in non-pregnant adults, and ultimately to postmarketing surveillance for outcomes in pregnant women and their infants. Each step can be enabled by clear criteria from international and local regulatory bodies on progression through study phases, standardized protocols for collecting relevant data, collaborative data sharing, pregnancy outcomes surveillance systems supported by committed funding for these endeavours.

conclusionsA formalized step-wise approach to including pregnant women in antiretroviral drug research should become the new norm. Systematic implementation of this approach would yield more timely and higher quality pregnancy dosing, safety and efficacy data. Through more vigorous action, regulatory bodies could responsibly overcome reluctance to include pregnant women in drug trials. Funders, researchers and programme implementers need to be galvanized to progressively include pregnant women in research - the use of newer, more effective drugs in women is at stake (349).

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAnti-Retroviral Agentsantiretroviralbirth defectschild healthdolutegravirdrug dosingHIVmaternal healthpregnancyteratogen

Identifiers

PMID31529598
PMCPMC6747006
OpenAlexW2974917770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.