ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019
Inclusion of pregnant women in antiretroviral drug research: what is needed to move forwards?
Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ethical considerations for research involving pregnant women living with HIV and their young children: a systematic review of the empiric literature and discussion.BMC medical ethics · 2021Pooled it
- DELIVER: A Safety Study of a Dapivirine Vaginal Ring and Oral PrEP for the Prevention of HIV During Pregnancy.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2024Trial
- Single-Dose Longitudinal Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Doravirine in Pregnant Women Living With HIV: Protocol for a Phase 1 Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- From Pharmacovigilance Signals to Mechanistic Phenotypes: Integrating ADMET, PK/PD, and Network Context to Interpret Antiviral Safety in Pregnancy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bridging disciplinary siloes: a scoping review on the inclusion and exclusion of pregnant and lactating populations in clinical research.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Clinical Trial Ethical Challenges in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of Systematic Review.Research square · 2025Article
- Medicine use during breastfeeding in Uganda: stakeholder perspectives on barriers and facilitators.International breastfeeding journal · 2025Article
- Investigations of Long-Acting Formulations in Children, Adolescents, and Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Clinical lactation studies. Acting on key recommendations over the last decade.npj women's health · 2025Review
- Perinatal outcomes associated with pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Communication is crucial: Lessons from COVID-19 vaccination and pregnancy.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Review
- Safety surveillance for PrEP in pregnant and breastfeeding women.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2023Review
- Pregnancy and medicines: time for paradigm change.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022Article
- Disrupting the status quo to achieve early inclusion of pregnant women in studies of new agents for prevention and treatment of HIV infection.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022Article
- Pooled Prevalence of Adverse Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe: Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses to Inform Trials of Novel HIV Prevention Interventions During Pregnancy.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2021Article
- The HIV drug optimization agenda: promoting standards for earlier investigation and approvals of antiretroviral drugs for use in adolescents living with HIV.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2020Article
- Inclusion of pregnant women in antiretroviral drug research: what is needed to move forwards?Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2019Article
- From presumptive exclusion towards fair inclusion: perspectives on the involvement of women living with HIV in clinical trials, including stakeholders' views.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo adequately ascertain drug safety and efficacy, drug trials need to include participants from all groups likely to receive the medication following approval. Pregnant women, however, are mostly excluded from trials, and women participating are often required to use highly effective contraception and taken off study product (even off study) if they conceive. There is little commercial incentive for including pregnant women in clinical trials, even when preclinical animal and human pharmacokinetic and safety data appear reassuring. With this conservative approach, large numbers of pregnant women are exposed to drug postlicensing with little known about drug safety and efficacy, and little done to systematically monitor outcomes of pregnancy exposure. DISCUSSION: The article focuses on antiretrovirals for treating and preventing HIV, and presents potential approaches which could extend to other therapeutic areas, to obtaining adequate and timely data to inform use of these drugs in this population. Most importantly the pregnancy risk profile of investigational agents can be systematically stratified from low to high risk, based on guidelines from regulatory bodies. This stratification can determine the progress through preclinical work with animals and non-pregnant women to opportunistic studies among women who become pregnant on a clinical trial or within routine clinical treatment. Stratification can include pregnant women in clinical trials, concurrent with Phase II/III trials in non-pregnant adults, and ultimately to postmarketing surveillance for outcomes in pregnant women and their infants. Each step can be enabled by clear criteria from international and local regulatory bodies on progression through study phases, standardized protocols for collecting relevant data, collaborative data sharing, pregnancy outcomes surveillance systems supported by committed funding for these endeavours.
conclusionsA formalized step-wise approach to including pregnant women in antiretroviral drug research should become the new norm. Systematic implementation of this approach would yield more timely and higher quality pregnancy dosing, safety and efficacy data. Through more vigorous action, regulatory bodies could responsibly overcome reluctance to include pregnant women in drug trials. Funders, researchers and programme implementers need to be galvanized to progressively include pregnant women in research - the use of newer, more effective drugs in women is at stake (349).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.