Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529512›Full record

ArticleJournal of leukocyte biology2020

Frontline Science: Antagonism between regular and atypical Cxcr3 receptors regulates macrophage migration during infection and injury in zebrafish.

Frida Sommer, Vincenzo Torraca, Sarah M Kamel, Amber Lombardi, Annemarie H Meijer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of leukocyte biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Transcriptomic response of lumpfish (Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Direct male development in chromosomally ZZ zebrafish.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  7. The regenerative response of cardiac interstitial cells.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. CXCL9-11 chemokines and CXCR3 receptor in teleost fish species.Fish and shellfish immunology reports · 2022
    Review
  10. Convergent copy number increase of genes associated with freshwater colonization in fishes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cxcl9l and Cxcr3.2 regulate recruitment of osteoclast progenitors to bone matrix in a medaka osteoporosis model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frida SommerInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vincenzo TorracaInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sarah M KamelInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Amber LombardiInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Annemarie H MeijerInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CXCR3-CXCL11 chemokine-signaling axis plays an essential role in infection and inflammation by orchestrating leukocyte trafficking in human and animal models, including zebrafish. Atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs) play a fundamental regulatory function in signaling networks by shaping chemokine gradients through their ligand scavenging function, while being unable to signal in the classic G-protein-dependent manner. Two copies of the CXCR3 gene in zebrafish, cxcr3.2 and cxcr3.3, are expressed on macrophages and share a highly conserved ligand-binding site. However, Cxcr3.3 has structural characteristics of ACKRs indicative of a ligand-scavenging role. In contrast, we previously showed that Cxcr3.2 is an active CXCR3 receptor because it is required for macrophage motility and recruitment to sites of mycobacterial infection. In this study, we generated a cxcr3.3 CRISPR-mutant to functionally dissect the antagonistic interplay among the cxcr3 paralogs in the immune response. We observed that cxcr3.3 mutants are more susceptible to mycobacterial infection, whereas cxcr3.2 mutants are more resistant. Furthermore, macrophages in the cxcr3.3 mutant are more motile, show higher activation status, and are recruited more efficiently to sites of infection or injury. Our results suggest that Cxcr3.3 is an ACKR that regulates the activity of Cxcr3.2 by scavenging common ligands and that silencing the scavenging function of Cxcr3.3 results in an exacerbated Cxcr3.2 signaling. In human, splice variants of CXCR3 have antagonistic functions and CXCR3 ligands also interact with ACKRs. Therefore, in zebrafish, an analogous regulatory mechanism appears to have evolved after the cxcr3 gene duplication event, through diversification of conventional and atypical receptor variants.

Indexed as

Cell MovementAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsMacrophagesMutationMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousMycobacterium marinumProtein ConformationReceptors, CXCR3ZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsReceptors, CXCR3Zebrafish ProteinsACKRGPCRmotilityMycobacterium marinumparalogsscavenger

Identifiers

PMID31529512
PMCPMC7028096
OpenAlexW2973256922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.