Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529265›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Wojciech Cytawa, Anna Katharina Seitz, Stefan Kircher, Kazuhito Fukushima, Johannes Tran-Gia, Andreas Schirbel, Tomasz Bandurski, Piotr Lass, Markus Krebs, Wojciech Połom and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07635524 (A Two Center Phase 2 Trial of 61Cu-noDAGa-PSMA I&T), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07635524 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Two Center Phase 2 Trial of 61Cu-noDAGa-PSMA I&T (61Cu-NU101) for Patients With Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoag Memorial Hospital PresbyterianRan2026 to 2028Enrolled34ConditionsProstate CancerArmsCu-NU101
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A prospective head-to-head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Trial
  4. Incremental Impact of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2022
    Trial
  5. Pelvic lymph-node staging withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Trial
  6. A dual-tracer approach for enhanced nodal staging in prostate cancer: the role of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Scalability study on [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. [Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Early biochemical and radiographic response after one cycle of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Wojciech CytawaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Smoluchowskiego Str. 17, 80-952, Gdańsk, Poland.
Anna Katharina SeitzDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefan KircherInstitute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken (CCCMF), University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Kazuhito FukushimaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Johannes Tran-GiaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Andreas SchirbelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Tomasz BandurskiDepartment of Radiology Informatics and Statistics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Piotr LassDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Smoluchowskiego Str. 17, 80-952, Gdańsk, Poland.
Markus KrebsDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Wojciech PołomDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Marcin MatuszewskiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Hans-Jürgen WesterPharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Andreas K BuckDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Hubert KüblerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Constantin LapaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Lapa_C@ukw.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7536-2207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study is based on a retrospective analysis of Gallium-68 (

methodsA total of 82 men were included in the study and were imaged with

resultsPSMA-positive disease was detected in 83% of patients with 66/82 (80.5%) primary tumours being visualized. PSMA-avid lymph nodes were recorded in 17/82 patients (20.7%, 3 with intermediate-risk and 14 with high-risk PCa); distant disease was found in 14/82 subjects (17.1%, 2 with intermediate-risk and 12 with high-risk PCa). No extraprostatic disease was found in low-risk PCa. SUV

conclusionsIn patients with initial diagnosis of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer,

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsEdetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingOligopeptidesRetrospective StudiesEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptides68Ga-PSMA I&TPET/CTPrimary stagingProstate cancerPSMA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.