Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529255›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Breast MRI during lactation: effects on tumor conspicuity using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) in comparison with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parametric maps.

Noam Nissan, Tanir Allweis, Tehillah Menes, Asia Brodsky, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Ilana Haas, Orit Golan, Yaheli Miller, Hani Barlev, Einat Carmon and 9 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Breast Imaging and Intervention during Pregnancy and Lactation.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2023
    Article
  6. Cancer in pregnancy: breast cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Noam NissanDepartment of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Emek Ha-Ella 1 st., 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel. noamniss@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5416-4199
Tanir AllweisDepartment of General Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Tehillah MenesDepartment of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Souraski Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Asia BrodskyDepartment of General Surgery, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Shani Paluch-ShimonDepartment of Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ilana HaasDepartment of General Surgery, Meir Medical Center, Saba, Israel.
Orit GolanDepartment of Radiology, Tel Aviv Souraski Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yaheli MillerDepartment of General Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Hani BarlevDepartment of General Surgery, Laniado Medical Center, Netanya, Israel.
Einat CarmonDepartment of General Surgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Malka BrodskyDepartment of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Emek Ha-Ella 1 st., 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Debbie AnabyDepartment of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Emek Ha-Ella 1 st., 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Philip LawsonDepartment of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Emek Ha-Ella 1 st., 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Osnat Halshtok-NeimanDepartment of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Emek Ha-Ella 1 st., 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Anat ShalmonDepartment of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Emek Ha-Ella 1 st., 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Michael GotliebDepartment of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Emek Ha-Ella 1 st., 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Renata FaermannDepartment of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Emek Ha-Ella 1 st., 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Eli KonenDepartment of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Emek Ha-Ella 1 st., 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Miri Sklair-LevyDepartment of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Emek Ha-Ella 1 st., 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Sheba Medical Center · ILKaplan Medical Center · ILTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILBnai Zion Medical Center · ILHadassah Medical Center · ILLaniado Hospital · ILMeir Medical Center · ILShaare Zedek Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the effect of lactation on breast cancer conspicuity on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in comparison with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parametric maps. MATERIALS AND

methodsEleven lactating patients with 16 biopsy-confirmed pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) lesions were prospectively evaluated by DCE and DTI on a 1.5-T MRI for pre-treatment evaluation. Additionally, DCE datasets of 16 non-lactating age-matched breast cancer patients were retrospectively reviewed, as control. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) comprising two regions of interests of the normal parenchyma was used to assess the differences in the tumor conspicuity on DCE subtraction images between lactating and non-lactating patients, as well as in comparison against DTI parametric maps of λ1, λ2, λ3, mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), and maximal anisotropy index, λ1-λ3.

resultsCNR values of breast cancer on DCE MRI among lactating patients were reduced by 62% and 58% (p < 0.001) in comparison with those in non-lactating patients, when taking into account the normal contralateral parenchyma and an area of marked background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), respectively. Among the lactating patients, DTI parameters of λ1, λ2, λ3, MD, and λ1-λ3 were significantly decreased, and FA was significantly increased in PABC, relative to the normal lactating parenchyma ROIs. When compared against DCE in the lactating cohort, the CNR on λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD was significantly superior, providing up to 138% more tumor conspicuity, on average.

conclusionBreast cancer conspicuity on DCE MRI is markedly reduced during lactation owing to the marked BPE. However, the additional application of DTI can improve the visualization and quantitative characterization of PABC, therefore possibly suggesting an additive value in the diagnostic workup of PABC. KEY POINTS: • Breast cancer conspicuity on DCE MRI has decreased by approximately 60% among lactating patients compared with non-lactating controls. • DTI-derived diffusion coefficients and the anisotropy indices of PABC lesions were significantly different than those of the normal lactating fibroglandular tissue. • Among lactating patients, breast cancer conspicuity on DTI-derived parametric maps provided up to 138% increase in contrast-to-noise ratio compared with DCE imaging.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaLactationAdultBreastBreast FeedingBreast NeoplasmsDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaBreastBreastfeedingDiffusionLactatingMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID31529255
OpenAlexW2973700026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.