Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529237›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020

Three-Phase Automatic Brain Tumor Diagnosis System Using Patches Based Updated Run Length Region Growing Technique.

T Kalaiselvi, P Kumarashankar, P Sriramakrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Brain tumor segmentation in MRI images using nonparametric localization and enhancement methods with U-net.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T KalaiselviSchool of Computer Science and Technologies, Department of Computer Science and Applications, The Gandhigram Rural Institute (Deemed to be University), Gandhigram, Tamil Nadu, 624302, India.
P KumarashankarSchool of Computer Science and Technologies, Department of Computer Science and Applications, The Gandhigram Rural Institute (Deemed to be University), Gandhigram, Tamil Nadu, 624302, India.
P SriramakrishnanSchool of Computing, Department of Computer Applications, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education (Deemed to be University), Krishnankoil, Tamil Nadu, 626126, India. sriram0210@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5339-673X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manually finding and segmenting brain tumor is a tedious process in MR brain images due to the unpredictable appearance of tissues with a different pattern, contour, mass, and positions. The proposed work has three phases automatic tumor diagnosis system for tumorous slice detection, segmentation, and visualization from MRI human head volumes. The proposed method has an automatic classification followed by segmentation and is called as patch-based updated run length region growing technique (PR2G). In the first phase, classification is done through training and testing process using SVM classifier with 8 × 8 patches. Three optimal features are chosen using infinite feature selection (IFS) method. The purpose of the first phase is to automatically cluster the input MRI image into a normal or tumorous slice and localize the tumor. The second phase aims to segment the tumor in abnormal tumorous slices identified by the first phase using run length region growing technique. Finally, the third phase contains a post metric evaluation like 3D tumor volume construction and estimation from actual and segmented tumor volume using Carelieri's estimator. Classification accuracy is measured using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and error rates also calculated using false alarm (FA) and missed alarm (MA). Segmentation accuracy is calculated using Dice similarity, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and accuracy. Datasets used for this experiment are collected from whole brain atlas (WBA) and BraTS repositories. Experimental results show that the PR2G achieves 97% of classification accuracy and 80% of Dice segmentation accuracy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBrainFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBrain tumorBraTS datasetFeature extractionRegion growingRun lengthTumor detectionTumor patches

Identifiers

PMID31529237
PMCPMC7165234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.