ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020
Three-Dimensional Texture Feature Analysis of Pulmonary Nodules in CT Images: Lung Cancer Predictive Models Based on Support Vector Machine Classifier.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving the efficiency of identifying malignant pulmonary nodules before surgery via a combination of artificial intelligence CT image recognition and serum autoantibodies.European radiology · 2023Trial
- Integrating Clinical Features, Laboratory Biomarkers and Computed Tomography for the Discrimination of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Benign Pulmonary Diseases: A Clinical Prediction Model.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- Application value of the automated machine learning model based on modified CT index combined with serological indices in the early prediction of lung cancer.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Application of radiomics in diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Form Factors as Potential Imaging Biomarkers to Differentiate Benign vs. Malignant Lung Lesions on CT Scans.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Role ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Lung Cancer Risk Using Nonimaging Electronic Medical Records: Deep Learning Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Evaluation of COVID-19 chest computed tomography: A texture analysis based on three-dimensional entropy.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2021Article
- CT Texture Analysis for Differentiating Bronchiolar Adenoma, AdenocarcinomaFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- A warning machine learning algorithm for early knee osteoarthritis structural progressor patient screening.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2021Article
- Value of Shape and Texture Features fromDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The Value of Topological Radiomics Analysis in Predicting Malignant Risk of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules: A Multi-Center Study.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To extract texture features of pulmonary nodules from three-dimensional views and to assess if predictive models of lung CT images from a three-dimensional texture feature could improve assessments conducted by radiologists. Clinical and CT imaging data for three dimensions (axial, coronal, and sagittal) in pulmonary nodules in 285 patients were collected from multiple centers and the Cancer Imaging Archive after ethics committee approval. Three-dimensional texture feature values (contourlets), and clinical and computed tomography (CT) imaging data were built into support vector machine (SVM) models to predict lung cancer, using four evaluation methods (disjunctive, conjunctive, voting, and synthetic); sensitivity, specificity, the Youden index, discriminant power (DP), and F value were calculated to assess model effectiveness. Additionally, diagnostic accuracy (three-dimensional model, axial model, and radiologist assessment) was assessed using the area under the curves for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Cross-sectional data from 285 patients (median age, 62 [range, 45-83] years; 115 males [40.4%]) were evaluated. Integrating three-dimensional assessments, the voting method had relatively high effectiveness based on both sensitivity (0.98) and specificity (0.79), which could improve radiologist diagnosis (maximum sensitivity, 0.75; maximum specificity, 0.51) for 23% and 28% respectively. Furthermore, the three-dimensional texture feature model of the voting method has the best diagnosis of precision rate (95.4%). Of all three-dimensional texture feature methods, the result of the voting method was the best, maintaining both high sensitivity and specificity scores. Additionally, the three-dimensional texture feature models were superior to two-dimensional models and radiologist-based assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.