Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529236›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020

Three-Dimensional Texture Feature Analysis of Pulmonary Nodules in CT Images: Lung Cancer Predictive Models Based on Support Vector Machine Classifier.

Ni Gao, Sijia Tian, Xia Li, Jian Huang, Jingjing Wang, Sipeng Chen, Yuan Ma, Xiangtong Liu, Xiuhua Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Role ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Value of Shape and Texture Features fromDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ni GaoSchool of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Sijia TianSchool of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Xia LiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jian HuangDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, 78746, Ireland.
Jingjing WangSchool of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Sipeng ChenSchool of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Yuan MaSchool of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Xiangtong LiuSchool of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Xiuhua GuoSchool of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China. guoxiuh@ccmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6657-6940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To extract texture features of pulmonary nodules from three-dimensional views and to assess if predictive models of lung CT images from a three-dimensional texture feature could improve assessments conducted by radiologists. Clinical and CT imaging data for three dimensions (axial, coronal, and sagittal) in pulmonary nodules in 285 patients were collected from multiple centers and the Cancer Imaging Archive after ethics committee approval. Three-dimensional texture feature values (contourlets), and clinical and computed tomography (CT) imaging data were built into support vector machine (SVM) models to predict lung cancer, using four evaluation methods (disjunctive, conjunctive, voting, and synthetic); sensitivity, specificity, the Youden index, discriminant power (DP), and F value were calculated to assess model effectiveness. Additionally, diagnostic accuracy (three-dimensional model, axial model, and radiologist assessment) was assessed using the area under the curves for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Cross-sectional data from 285 patients (median age, 62 [range, 45-83] years; 115 males [40.4%]) were evaluated. Integrating three-dimensional assessments, the voting method had relatively high effectiveness based on both sensitivity (0.98) and specificity (0.79), which could improve radiologist diagnosis (maximum sensitivity, 0.75; maximum specificity, 0.51) for 23% and 28% respectively. Furthermore, the three-dimensional texture feature model of the voting method has the best diagnosis of precision rate (95.4%). Of all three-dimensional texture feature methods, the result of the voting method was the best, maintaining both high sensitivity and specificity scores. Additionally, the three-dimensional texture feature models were superior to two-dimensional models and radiologist-based assessments.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySupport Vector MachineTomography, X-Ray ComputedContourletsPredictive modelPulmonary noduleThree dimensions

Identifiers

PMID31529236
PMCPMC7165221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.