Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529220›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastroenterology2020

Indigo naturalis is effective even in treatment-refractory patients with ulcerative colitis: a post hoc analysis from the INDIGO study.

Makoto Naganuma, Shinya Sugimoto, Tomohiro Fukuda, Keiichi Mitsuyama, Taku Kobayashi, Naoki Yoshimura, Hidehisa Ohi, Shinji Tanaka, Akira Andoh, Naoki Ohmiya and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pharmaceutical biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Makoto NaganumaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan. nagamakoto@keio.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4244-3243
Shinya SugimotoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Tomohiro FukudaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Keiichi MitsuyamaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Taku KobayashiCenter for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki YoshimuraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of IBD, Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidehisa OhiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Imamura Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Shinji TanakaDepartment of Endoscopy and Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Akira AndohDepartment of Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Naoki OhmiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Keiichiro SaigusaDepartment of Medicine, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki YamamotoIBD Center, Yokkaichi Hazu Medical Center, Yokkaichi, Japan.
Yuichi MorohoshiDepartment of Medicine, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Hitoshi IchikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Japan.
Katsuyoshi MatsuokaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan.
Tadakazu HisamatsuThe Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka, Japan.
Kenji WatanabeDepartment of Intestinal Inflammation Research, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Shinta MizunoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Takayuki AbeDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Biostatistics Unit at Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuo SuzukiInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan.
Takanori KanaiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
INDIGO Study Group
Keio University · JPToho University · JPFujita Health University · JPHyogo Medical University · JPKurume University · JPYokkaichi Social Insurance Hospital · JPHiroshima University Hospital · JPImamura Hospital · JPShiga University of Medical Science · JPTokai University Hachioji Hospital · JPTokyo Yamate Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe recently reported the efficacy of indigo naturalis (IN) in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) in a randomized controlled trial (INDIGO study). However, few studies have been conducted to investigate whether IN is effective even in treatment-refractory cases, such as in those with steroid dependency and anti-TNF refractoriness.

methodsIn the INDIGO study, 86 patients with active UC were randomly assigned to an IN group (0.5-2.0 g daily) or placebo group. The rate of clinical response (CR), mucosal healing (MH), and change in fecal calprotectin (FCP) levels was compared between refractory [patients with steroid-dependent disease, previous use of anti-TNF-α, and concomitant use of immunomodulators (IM)] and non-refractory patients. We also analyzed factors predicting CR and MH at week 8.

resultsThe rates of CR of IN group were significantly higher than placebo group, even in patients with steroid-dependent disease (p < 0.001), previous use of anti-TNF-α (p = 0.002), and concomitant use of IM (p = 0.013). The rates of MH in IN group were significantly higher than in placebo group in patients with steroid-dependent disease (p = 0.009). In the IN group, median FCP levels, at week 8, were significantly lower than baseline in patients with steroid-dependent disease and patients with the previous use of anti-TNF-α (p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that the previous use of anti-TNF-α was not a predictive factor for CR and MH at week 8.

conclusionsIn a sub-analysis of data from a randomized placebo-controlled trial, we found that IN may be useful even in patients with steroid-dependent disease and patients with the previous use of anti-TNF-α.

Indexed as

AdultColitis, UlcerativeDrugs, Chinese HerbalFecesFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsIntestinal MucosaLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMaleMiddle AgedRetreatmentSeverity of Illness IndexSteroidsTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsDrugs, Chinese HerbalImmunologic FactorsLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexQingdai compoundSteroidsTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAnti-TNFa treatmentIndigo naturalisSteroid dependentUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID31529220
OpenAlexW2974172557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.