Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529202›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Pelvic floor ultrasound: when, why, and how?

Simin Bahrami, Gaurav Khatri, Alison D Sheridan, Suzanne L Palmer, Mark E Lockhart, Hina Arif-Tiwari, Phyllis Glanc

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06886997 (Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Versus Urodynamic Studies in Evaluating Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06886997 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Versus Urodynamic Studies in Evaluating Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence

TypeobservationalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsStress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)ArmsPelvic Floor Ultrasound, Urodynamic studies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of artificial intelligence to ultrasound imaging for benign gynecological disorders: systematic review.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Vaginal tactile imaging: A review.Pelviperineology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ultrasound in Female Urinary Incontinence.Journal of medical ultrasound
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Simin BahramiDivision of Abdominal Imaging & Interventions, Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 757 Westwood Plaza Ste. # 1621, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7437, USA. sbahrami@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4371-0366
Gaurav KhatriDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-1650
Alison D SheridanAbdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, USA.
Suzanne L PalmerClinical Radiology and Medicine, Division Chief, Body Imaging, Keck Medical Center of USC University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Mark E LockhartDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Hina Arif-TiwariDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Phyllis GlancDepartment of Radiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Banner - University Medical Center Tucson · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic floor disorders are a significant medical issue, reportedly affecting nearly one in four women in the United States. Nonetheless, until the last decade, there has been relatively limited imaging research into this highly prevalent disorder. The three major imaging modalities utilized to assess pelvic floor function are ultrasound, MRI and fluoroscopy. Pelvic floor ultrasound is a rapidly emerging technique which takes advantage of the widespread availability of ultrasound, the non-invasive and relatively inexpensive approach and the incorporation of real-time imaging and software advances which permit 3-D volume imaging. Pelvic floor ultrasound provides the opportunity to optimize patient counseling and enhance pre-operative planning by providing an anatomic and functional roadmap for the referring clinician. We recommend the consideration of pelvic floor ultrasound, as described here, as an addition to the imaging armamentarium available to physicians and surgeons serving this patient population.

Indexed as

Pelvic FloorPelvic Floor DisordersFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographyPelvic floor dysfunctionPelvic floor ultrasoundSlingTranslabial

Identifiers

PMID31529202
OpenAlexW2974084215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.