Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2019
Medication errors in the care transition of trauma patients.
Observational study in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND
objectiveTraumatological patients are vulnerable to medication error given multiple handoffs throughout the hospital since they often require rapid diagnosis and management of multiple concurrent complex conditions. The purpose of this study was to analyze the medication errors (MEs) occurring in the care transition of the traumatological patient. The secondary objectives were to classify the MEs and the level of risk of the pharmacological groups involved. In addition, the causes and contributing factors of those MEs were analyzed.
methodsAn observational, descriptive, and prospective study, spanning 4 months, was performed in a tertiary hospital. All patients admitted to the traumatology service were selected for the study. Data were collected in different locations of the hospital stay: Emergency Service, Resuscitation and Post-Anaesthesia Unit, and Traumatology Hospitalization Unit. In each location, data from the different processes (reconciliation, prescription, validation, dispensing, and administration of medicines) were collected. The medication error (ME) was established as a dependent variable.
resultsA total of 31.3% (132) of the patients analyzed showed some ME. The Traumatology Unit was the location where most errors were detected, followed by the Emergency Service. Having analyzed all the locations, it was observed that 64.2% (172) of the MEs were detected in the reconciliation process, 29.5% (79) in the prescription, 3.7% (10) in the dispensing, 1.5% (4) in the administration, and 1.1% (3) in the validation. In terms of risk weighting, the drugs involved in the MEs detected were 53.8% of medium risk, 20.7% of high risk, and 20.3% of low risk.
conclusionsThere is a high prevalence of MEs in the reconciliation process of medication in traumatological patients (64.2%) from our hospital setting. Interestingly, most MEs occurred in this process regardless of the location in the healthcare chain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31529143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.