ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019
What health records data are required for accurate prediction of suicidal behavior?
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06060535 (Evaluating Effectiveness and Implementation of a Risk Model for Suicide Prevention Across Health Systems), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating Effectiveness and Implementation of a Risk Model for Suicide Prevention Across Health Systems
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prediction models for self-harm and suicide: a systematic review and critical appraisal.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in mental health care: a systematic review of diagnosis, monitoring, and intervention applications.Psychological medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Structured data vs. unstructured data in machine learning prediction models for suicidal behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Pooled it
- Are there missed warning signals before traffic-related traumatic spinal cord injury? An exploratory case-control study using electronic health records.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Inference on summaries of a model-agnostic longitudinal variable importance trajectory with application to suicide prevention.The annals of applied statistics · 2026Article
- Conceptualization and development of the Maryland suicide data warehouse to improve mortality prediction.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Suicide Risk Screening in Jails: Protocol for a Pilot Study Leveraging the Mental Health Research Network Algorithm and Health Care Data.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Considerations and Challenges When Using Clinical and Vital Record Review for Suicide Research.Journal of patient safety · 2025Article
- Automatically extracting social determinants of health for suicide: a narrative literature review.Npj mental health research · 2024Review
- Performance of Machine Learning Suicide Risk Models in an American Indian Population.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- High-density lipoprotein (HDL) as an indicator for alcohol use in a psychiatrically ill population.Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire) · 2024Observational
- Determining Distinct Suicide Attempts From Recurrent Electronic Health Record Codes: Classification Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Predicting risk of suicidal behavior from insurance claims data vs. linked data from insurance claims and electronic health records.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2024Article
- Managed care updates of subscriber jail release to prompt community suicide prevention: clinical trial protocol.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Health Service Protection vis-à-vis the Detection of Psychosocial Risks of Suicide during the Years 2019-2021.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Prediction of Suicide Risk Does Not Identify Patients Without Traditional Risk Factors.The Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2022Article
- Health care utilization among individuals who die by suicide as compared to the general population: a population-based register study in Sweden.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Validating a predictive algorithm for suicide risk with Alaska Native populations.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence and suicide prevention: a systematic review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022Review
- Clinical risk prediction models and informative cluster size: Assessing the performance of a suicide risk prediction algorithm.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe study sought to evaluate how availability of different types of health records data affect the accuracy of machine learning models predicting suicidal behavior. MATERIALS AND
methodsRecords from 7 large health systems identified 19 061 056 outpatient visits to mental health specialty or general medical providers between 2009 and 2015. Machine learning models (logistic regression with penalized LASSO [least absolute shrinkage and selection operator] variable selection) were developed to predict suicide death (n = 1240) or probable suicide attempt (n = 24 133) in the following 90 days. Base models were used only historical insurance claims data and were then augmented with data regarding sociodemographic characteristics (race, ethnicity, and neighborhood characteristics), past patient-reported outcome questionnaires from electronic health records, and data (diagnoses and questionnaires) recorded during the visit.
resultsFor prediction of any attempt following mental health specialty visits, a model limited to historical insurance claims data performed approximately as well (C-statistic 0.843) as a model using all available data (C-statistic 0.850). For prediction of suicide attempt following a general medical visit, addition of data recorded during the visit yielded a meaningful improvement over a model using all data up to the prior day (C-statistic 0.853 vs 0.838). DISCUSSION: Results may not generalize to setting with less comprehensive data or different patterns of care. Even the poorest-performing models were superior to brief self-report questionnaires or traditional clinical assessment.
conclusionsImplementation of suicide risk prediction models in mental health specialty settings may be less technically demanding than expected. In general medical settings, however, delivery of optimal risk predictions at the point of care may require more sophisticated informatics capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.