Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529095›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

What health records data are required for accurate prediction of suicidal behavior?

Gregory E Simon, Susan M Shortreed, Eric Johnson, Rebecca C Rossom, Frances L Lynch, Rebecca Ziebell, And Robert B Penfold

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06060535 (Evaluating Effectiveness and Implementation of a Risk Model for Suicide Prevention Across Health Systems), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06060535 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Effectiveness and Implementation of a Risk Model for Suicide Prevention Across Health Systems

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2022 to 2026Enrolled394,000ConditionsSuicide, Attempted, Suicide, FatalArmsSuicide Attempt Risk Model Care Pathway
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Artificial intelligence and suicide prevention: a systematic review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gregory E SimonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Susan M ShortreedKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Eric JohnsonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Rebecca C RossomHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Frances L LynchCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Rebecca ZiebellKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
And Robert B PenfoldKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

SSRI's and SuicidalityU19MH092201 · NIMH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SIMON, GREGORY E. · 2010 to 2018
$19.5M
NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH092201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study sought to evaluate how availability of different types of health records data affect the accuracy of machine learning models predicting suicidal behavior. MATERIALS AND

methodsRecords from 7 large health systems identified 19 061 056 outpatient visits to mental health specialty or general medical providers between 2009 and 2015. Machine learning models (logistic regression with penalized LASSO [least absolute shrinkage and selection operator] variable selection) were developed to predict suicide death (n = 1240) or probable suicide attempt (n = 24 133) in the following 90 days. Base models were used only historical insurance claims data and were then augmented with data regarding sociodemographic characteristics (race, ethnicity, and neighborhood characteristics), past patient-reported outcome questionnaires from electronic health records, and data (diagnoses and questionnaires) recorded during the visit.

resultsFor prediction of any attempt following mental health specialty visits, a model limited to historical insurance claims data performed approximately as well (C-statistic 0.843) as a model using all available data (C-statistic 0.850). For prediction of suicide attempt following a general medical visit, addition of data recorded during the visit yielded a meaningful improvement over a model using all data up to the prior day (C-statistic 0.853 vs 0.838). DISCUSSION: Results may not generalize to setting with less comprehensive data or different patterns of care. Even the poorest-performing models were superior to brief self-report questionnaires or traditional clinical assessment.

conclusionsImplementation of suicide risk prediction models in mental health specialty settings may be less technically demanding than expected. In general medical settings, however, delivery of optimal risk predictions at the point of care may require more sophisticated informatics capability.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, PsychologicalSuicide, AttemptedAdolescentAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSelf ReportSuicideelectronic health recordsinsurance claimsmachine learningpatient-reported outcomesrisk predictionsuicide

Identifiers

PMID31529095
PMCPMC6857508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.