Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31529094›Full record

ArticleSleep2019

Long-term use of pitolisant to treat patients with narcolepsy: Harmony III Study.

Yves Dauvilliers, Isabelle Arnulf, Zoltan Szakacs, Smaranda Leu-Semenescu, Isabelle Lecomte, Catherine Scart-Gres, Jeanne-Marie Lecomte, Jean-Charles Schwartz, HARMONY III study group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Narcolepsy and psychosis: A systematic review.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Future of Parasomnias.Journal of sleep research · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Orphan Drugs in Neurology-A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Histamine HCellular and molecular neurobiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment of histamine HEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yves DauvilliersReference National Center for Narcolepsy, Sleep Unit, Department of Neurology, Gui-de-Chauliac Hospital, University of Montpellier 1, Montpellier, INSERM U1061, France.
Isabelle ArnulfSleep Disorder Unit, Hôpital la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Zoltan SzakacsState Health Center, Budapest, Hungary.
Smaranda Leu-SemenescuSleep Disorder Unit, Hôpital la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Isabelle LecomteBioprojet, 9, rue Rameau, Paris, France.
Catherine Scart-GresBioprojet, 9, rue Rameau, Paris, France.
Jeanne-Marie LecomteBioprojet, 9, rue Rameau, Paris, France.
Jean-Charles SchwartzBioprojet, 9, rue Rameau, Paris, France.
HARMONY III study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesTo asses the long-term safety and efficacy of pitolisant, an histamine H3-receptor antagonist, on narcolepsy.

methodsThis open-label, single-arm, pragmatic study, recruited adult patients with narcolepsy and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score ≥12. After a titration period, patients were treated for up to 1 year with oral pitolisant once-a-day at up to 40 mg. Concomitant stimulants and anti-cataplectic agents were allowed. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included ESS, cataplexy, and other diary parameters.

resultsPatients (n = 102, 75 with cataplexy) received pitolisant, for the first time in 73 of them. Sixty-eight patients (51 with cataplexy) completed the 12-month treatment. Common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (11.8% of patients), insomnia (8.8%), weight gain (7.8%), anxiety (6.9%), depressive symptoms (4.9%), and nausea (4.9%). Seven patients had a serious adverse effect, unrelated to pitolisant except for a possibly related miscarriage. One-third of patients stopped pitolisant, mostly (19.6%) for insufficient benefit. ESS score decreased by 4.6 ± 0.6. Two-thirds of patients completing the treatment were responders (ESS ≤ 10 or ESS decrease ≥ 3), and one third had normalized ESS (≤10). Complete and partial cataplexy, hallucinations, sleep paralysis, and sleep attacks were reduced by 76%, 65%, 54%, 63%, and 27%, respectively. Pitolisant as monotherapy (43% of patients) was better tolerated and more efficacious on ESS than on add-on, but efficacy was maintained in this last case.

conclusionsLong-term safety and efficacy of pitolisant on daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, hallucinations, and sleep paralysis is confirmed.

Indexed as

AdultAnxietyCentral Nervous System StimulantsDepressionFemaleHeadacheHistamine H3 AntagonistsHumansMaleNarcolepsyPiperidinesSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersTreatment OutcomeCentral Nervous System StimulantsHistamine H3 AntagonistsPiperidinespitolisantcataplexyexcessive daytime sleepinessnarcolepsypitolisant

Identifiers

PMID31529094
PMCPMC6802569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.