ArticleSoft matter2019
Toward building a physical model for membrane selectivity of antimicrobial peptides: making a quantitative sense of the selectivity.
Article in Soft matter, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling selectivity of antimicrobial peptides: how it depends on the presence of host cells and cell density.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Characteristics and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial peptides.Biophysics reviews · 2021Review
- Modeling Cell Selectivity of Antimicrobial Peptides: How Is the Selectivity Influenced by Intracellular Peptide Uptake and Cell Density.Frontiers in medical technology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are naturally-occurring peptide antibiotics. AMPs are typically cationic and utilize their electrostatic interactions with the bacterial membrane to selectively attack bacteria. The way they work has inspired a vigorous search for optimized peptides for fighting resistant bacteria. Here, we present a physical model of membrane selectivity of AMPs. The challenge for theoretical modeling of membrane-peptide systems arises from the simultaneous presence of several competing effects, including lipid demixing and peptide-peptide interactions on the membrane surface. We first examine critically a number of models of peptide-membrane interactions and map out one, which incorporates adequately these competing effects as well as the geometry of various regions in membranes, occupied by bound peptides, anionic lipids within the interaction range of each peptide, and those outside this range. This effort leads to a systematically-improved model for peptide selectivity. Using the model, we relate peptide's intrinsic (Ccell-independent) selectivity to an apparent, Ccell-dependent one, and clarify the relative roles of peptide parameters and cell densities in determining their selectivity. This relationship suggests that the selectivity is more sensitive to peptide parameters at low cell densities; as a result, the optimal peptide charge, at which the selectivity is maximized, increases with the cell density in such a manner that this notion becomes less meaningful at high cell densities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.