Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31528847›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2018

Providers' assessment of a novel interactive health information technology in a pediatric intensive care unit.

Onur Asan, Richard J Holden, Kathryn E Flynn, Kathy Murkowski, Matthew C Scanlon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Onur AsanDepartment of Medicine, Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Richard J HoldenDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Kathryn E FlynnDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Kathy MurkowskiDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Matthew C ScanlonDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USRegenstrief Institute · US

Funding

Perception and Use of a Patient Care Window to Improve Care and Family EngagementR21HS023626 · AHRQ · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI ASAN, ONUR · 2014 to 2015
$300k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS023626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore perceptions of critical care providers about a novel collaborative inpatient health information technology (HIT) in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting.

methodsThis cross-sectional, concurrent mixed methods study was conducted in the PICU of a large midwestern children's hospital. The technology, the Large Customizable Interactive Monitor (LCIM), is a flat panel touch screen monitor that displays validated patient information from the electronic health record. It does not require a password to login and is available in each patient's room for viewing and interactive use by physicians, nurses, and families. Quantitative data were collected via self-administered, standardized surveys, and qualitative data via in-person, semistructured interviews between January and April 2015. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis.

resultsThe qualitative analysis showed positive impacts of the LCIM on providers' workflow, team interactions, and interactions with families. Providers reported concerns regarding perceived patient information overload and associated anxiety and burden for families. Sixty percent of providers thought that LCIM was useful for their jobs at different levels, and almost 70% of providers reported that LCIM improved information sharing and communication with families. The average overall satisfaction score was 3.4 on a 0 to 6 scale, between "a moderate amount" and "pretty much." DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThis study provides new insight into collaborative HIT in the inpatient pediatric setting and demonstrates that using such technology has the potential to improve providers' experiences with families and just-in-time access to EHR information in a format more easily shared with families.

Indexed as

collaborative health information technologyfamily engagementhuman–computer interactionpediatric intensive care

Identifiers

PMID31528847
PMCPMC6746319
OpenAlexW2808133352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.