ArticlePeerJ2019
Mapping research trends of retinal vein occlusion from 2009 to 2018: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends and hot spots in research related to aqueous humor from 2014 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Current trends and research topics regarding organoids: A bibliometric analysis of global research from 2000 to 2023.Heliyon · 2024Article
- The role of serum metrics in anti- VEGF treatment for macular edema induced by retinal vein occlusion.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Mapping the Hot Spots and Evolution Main Path of Whole-Body Vibration Training Since the 21st Century: A Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Mapping Research Trends of Universal Health Coverage From 1990 to 2019: Bibliometric Analysis.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2021Article
- Publication Trends on Mitophagy in the World and China: A 16-Year Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Bibliometric analysis and mapping knowledge domain of pterygium: 2000-2019.International journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo map publication trends and explore research hotspots of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) study.
methodsBased on Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), a bibliometric analysis was carried out. The knowledge map was constructed by VOSviewer v.1.6.10 to visualize the annual publication number, the distribution of countries, international collaborations, author productivity, source journals, cited reference and keywords in this field.
resultsA total of 2,135 peer-reviewed papers were retrieved on RVO from 2009 to 2018. The United States ranks highest among countries with the most publications and the most active institution was Kyoto University. Noma H contributed the most publications in this field.
conclusionsThe six major research hotspots could provide an insight into RVO research and valuable information for researchers to identify potential collaborators and partner institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.