Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31528444›Full record

ReviewSurgical neurology international2019

Internal jugular phlebectasia: A systematic review.

Jose A Figueroa-Sanchez, Ana S Ferrigno, Mario Benvenutti-Regato, Enrique Caro-Osorio, Hector R Martinez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical neurology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Synchronous Aberration of the Jugular and Carotid-a Case Report.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Congenital Internal Jugular Phlebectasia: An Anomaly Still Poorly Recognized.European journal of pediatric surgery reports · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Internal jugular venous aneurysm-A report of two cases with literature review.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jose A Figueroa-SanchezInstitute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, San Pedro Garza García, N.L., México.
Ana S FerrignoInstitute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, San Pedro Garza García, N.L., México.
Mario Benvenutti-RegatoInstitute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, San Pedro Garza García, N.L., México.
Enrique Caro-OsorioInstitute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, San Pedro Garza García, N.L., México.
Hector R MartinezInstitute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, San Pedro Garza García, N.L., México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternal jugular phlebectasia (IJP), the abnormal dilatation of internal jugular vein, is generally considered a benign anomaly. However, because IJP is uncommon, little is known about its natural history, and currently, no consensus on the best treatment modality is available.

methodsThe purpose of this article is to conduct a systematic review of available literature on recently reported IJP cases to understand the main characteristics of IJP and its most frequent therapeutic approaches. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, literature search for IJP cases was conducted in the COCHRANE, PUBMED, EBSCOHOST, SCOPUS, OVID, and SCIELO databases.

resultsA total of 97 original articles were found, with a total of 247 IJP cases reported including both pediatric and adult patients.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest systematic review analyzing all the reported cases of IJP. IJP is considered by most authors as a benign abnormality that predominantly affects the right jugular vein. It is most commonly diagnosed in children. At present, conservative treatment is preferred for pediatric but not for adult patients. Multicenter randomized prospective studies are required to further understand this rare anomaly.

Indexed as

Internal jugular veinNeck massPhlebectasiaVenous dilatation

Identifiers

PMID31528444
PMCPMC6744733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.