Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31528388›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2019

Reconstruction of the spinal cord of spinal transected dogs with polyethylene glycol.

Shuai Ren, Zehan Liu, C Yoon Kim, Kuang Fu, Qiong Wu, Liting Hou, Linlin Sun, Jian Zhang, Qing Miao, Jin Kim and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Shuai RenHand and Microsurgery Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Zehan LiuHand and Microsurgery Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
C Yoon KimDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 10100, Korea.
Kuang FuDepartment of MR Diagnosis, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Qiong WuDepartment of MR Diagnosis, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Liting HouDepartment of Anesthesia, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Linlin SunDepartment of Pharmacology, Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Jian ZhangHand and Microsurgery Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Qing MiaoHand and Microsurgery Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Jin KimDepartment of Laboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 10100, Korea.
Vincenzo BonicalziDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Xiangchen GuanHand and Microsurgery Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Mingzhe ZhangHand and Microsurgery Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Weihua ZhangHand and Microsurgery Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Junfeng XuHand and Microsurgery Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Sergio CanaveroDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.
Xiaoping RenHand and Microsurgery Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang, Harbin 150081, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur study shows that a membrane sealant/fiber fusogen polyethylene glycol (PEG) applied immediately on a sharp section of the spinal cord can mend the cord and lead to exceptional levels of motor recovery, with some animals almost normal. MATERIALS AND

methodsBefore deploying such technology in man, long-term data in large mammals that exclude delayed complications (e.g., central pain), confirm the stability of motor recovery, and provide histological evidence of fiber regrowth are necessary. Here, we provide such evidence in dogs followed up over 6 months and in 2 cases up to 1 year along with imaging and histologic data.

resultsWe show that dogs whose dorsal cord has been fully transected recover locomotion after immediate treatment with a fusogen (PEG). No pain syndrome ensued over the long term. Diffusion tensor imaging magnetic resonance and histological, including immunohistochemical, data confirmed the re-establishment of anatomical continuity along with interfacial axonal sprouting.

conclusionsThis study proves that a form of irreversible spinal cord injury (SCI) can effectively be treated and points out a way to treat SCI patients.

Indexed as

Polyethylene glycolspinal cord fusionspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID31528388
PMCPMC6743687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.