ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2019
Regulatory framework in Pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations.
Review in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Regulatory Convergence in Cell and Gene Therapy: Harmonizing Quality, CMC, and Approval Pathways Across the FDA, EMA, PMDA, and Emerging Markets.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Review
- Actor-network and stakeholder analysis in preventing health goods smuggling in Iran.Globalization and health · 2025Article
- The safety of herbal medicines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): current landscape and promoting the pharmacovigilance practices.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Barriers to and enablers of Pakistani pharmaceutical export to regulated markets: regulatory perspective.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Traditional herbal medicine legislative and regulatory framework: a cross-sectional quantitative study and archival review perspectives.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- A qualitative exploration of counterfeit, substandard, spurious, and adulterated drugs in Pakistan: A perspective of drug law experts.PloS one · 2025Article
- One Health: governance and regulatory framework for antimicrobial use in Malawi.Science in One Health · 2025Article
- A qualitative exploration of consumers' views and experiences toward online pharmacies: Narrative from a developing country.PloS one · 2025Article
- The challenges associated with the prevention of smuggling and counterfeiting health goods in Iran.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Implementation of Pakistan's National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance in the Agriculture and Food Sectors.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- The plague of unexpected drug recalls and the pandemic of falsified medications in cardiovascular medicine as a threat to patient safety and global public health: A brief review.Cardiology journal · 2022Review
- [Market surveillance and control of substandard, falsified and unregistered medicines: integrative reviewVigilancia y control de medicamentos subestándar, falsificados y no registrados: una revisión integral].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022Article
- A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Views on Pharmacovigilance System, Policy, and Coordination in Pakistan.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Article
- Substandard and falsified medical product recalls in Zambia from 2018 to 2021 and implications on the quality surveillance systems.The journal of medicine accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality issues in pharmaceuticals are identified as a huge global and public health problem, especially with reference to low- and middle-income countries like Pakistan. The 2011 "Fake Drug Crisis" acted as a driving force to reform the regulatory structures of the country and for establishing the autonomous "Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan". Despite the fact that Pakistan possesses a huge pharmaceutical industry, there is a severe dearth of published literature and scientific evidence for the country regarding medicine quality and the prevalence of counterfeit and low-quality products, respectively. AIMS AND
objectivesThis narrative review covers relevant features of the regulatory framework for pharmaceuticals in Pakistan, its national pharmaceutical industry, as well as a compilation and analysis of published literature for documentation of the country's situation regarding the overall quality of medicines.
methodsAvailable data including scientific publications on the quality of pharmaceuticals in peer reviewed journals, research reports, notifications, and alerts issued by the World Health Organization and other agencies were accessed and compiled. Post graduate dissertations were used to represent unpublished research data and drug safety alerts issued from the local Pakistan authority were analysed to assess the type and number of quality failures reported for pharmaceuticals.
resultsIt could be clearly shown that there is negligible scientific data available on the issue of medicine quality in Pakistan. The anticipated number of 40-50% of poor-quality drugs in Pakistan cannot be defended by data available from the literature. Accessible technologies and strategies used in recent years at global level, especially in developing countries, were also reviewed and recommendations are devised for Pakistan to combat the fight against poor-quality medicines.
conclusionThe case reports, investigations, and general data listed for Pakistan suggest the need of strengthening regulatory systems for premises and GMP inspections, analytical laboratories, as well as an overall capacity building in the field of unravelling and controlling substandard and falsified medicines. It is proposed that well-planned and properly funded studies need to be carried out for collecting critical statistics regarding the prevalence of substandard and falsified medicines in Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.