ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2019
Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of C17 fengycin B fromApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Efficacy and Mechanisms of Butyric Acid Derivatives as Feed Additives in Weaned Piglet Nutrition: A Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recombinant Bacillus subtilis Displaying DHAV-1 VP1 Protein as a Dual-Function Probiotic: Evaluation of Immunological Efficacy, Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, and Intestinal Health in Cherry Valley Ducks.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Probiotics and enzymes in weaned piglets' diets can lower belly nosing frequency and improve performance and nitrogen balance.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Review
- Impact of dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis on the metabolic profiles and microbial ecology of weanling pigs experimentally infected with a pathogenic Escherichia coli.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Article
- The effects of citral on the intestinal health and growth performance of American bullfrogs (Aquarana catesbeiana).BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Efficacy of supplemental amino acids with Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass on growth and health of nursery pigs.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Winning the battle of intestinal peace withFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Live Multi-Strain Probiotics Enhance Growth Performance by Regulating Intestinal Morphology and Microbiome Population in Weaning Piglets.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Effects of single and complex probiotics in growing-finishing pigs and swine compost.Journal of animal science and technology · 2024Article
- Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Dietary Bacillus spp. supplementation to both sow and progenies improved post-weaning growth rate, gut function, and reduce the pro-inflammatory cytokine production in weaners challenged with Escherichia coli K88.Animal microbiome · 2024Article
- Review
- Functional evaluation ofTranslational animal science · 2024Article
- Dose-Dependent Effects of Supplementing a Two-StrainAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- FeedingAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2023Article
- Risk factors associated with post-weaning diarrhoea in Austrian piglet-producing farms.Porcine health management · 2023Article
- Effects of dietary supplementation ofJournal of animal science and technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProbiosis is considered a potential strategy to reduce antibiotics use and prevent post-weaning diarrhea (PWD). This study investigated the effect of
methodsSixty-four post-weaning piglets (7748 g ± 643 g) were randomly allocated to four groups: control basal diet (CO); CO + 1.28 × 10
resultsAB and BAS reduced the fecal score impairment compared to CO (
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.