Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31528036›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2019

Gamal Younis, Mona Mady, Amal Awad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial-resistant foodborne pathogens in the Middle East: a systematic review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anti-bacterial and Anti-biofilm Effects of Equol onIndian journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Virulence Determinants and Genetic Diversity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence, Virulence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gamal YounisDepartment of Bacteriology, Mycology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Mona MadyDepartment of Bacteriology, Mycology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Amal AwadDepartment of Bacteriology, Mycology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Mansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence of MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 210 samples (120 retail chicken meat, 30 ground beef, 30 beef burger, and 30 sausage samples) were collected from different retail chicken outlets and markets located at Mansoura city between December 2016 and April 2017. Meat samples were examined bacteriologically for the existence of

resultsThirty

conclusionThe presence of

Indexed as

antimicrobial susceptibilitybiofilm formationvirulence genesYersinia enterocolitica

Identifiers

PMID31528036
PMCPMC6702571
OpenAlexW2963637823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.