Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31528002›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2019

Examination of the intrarater reliability of ultrasound measurements of the thickness of the lumbar and lateral abdominal muscles in the prone position.

Wataru Nanikawa, Junya Miyazaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wataru NanikawaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Aino University: 4-5-4 Higashioda, Ibaraki-shi, Osaka 567-0012, Japan.
Junya MiyazakiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Kyoto Tachibana University, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to examine the intrarater reliability when measuring the thickness of the lumbar and lateral abdominal muscles using ultrasound with the participants in the prone position. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 10 healthy adult males without chronic low back pain. The muscle thicknesses of the lumbar multifidus, erector spinae, obliquus externus abdominis, obliquus internus abdominis, and transversus abdominal muscles were measured using ultrasound with the participants in the prone position. [Results] The intraclass correlation coefficients of the within-day and between-day intrarater reliability measurements were 31.1-34.1 mm (lumbar multifidus), 32.0-33.5 mm (erector spinae), 7.4-8.0 mm (obliquus externus abdominis), 9.4-10.4 mm (obliquus internus abdominis), and 2.9-3.4 mm (transversus abdominal). The standard error of measurement and 95% confidence interval of minimal detectable change of the within- and between-day measurements were 0.1-1.2 mm and 0.3-3.4 mm, respectively, for each muscle. [Conclusion] The reliability of measuring the lumbar and lateral abdominal muscles in the prone position using ultrasound was confirmed. It was suggested that measurements during muscle activity and extremity movement are possible when participants are in the prone position.

Indexed as

Lateral abdominal musclesProne positionUltrasound measurement

Identifiers

PMID31528002
PMCPMC6698477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.