Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31527919›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Randomized control trial of Tools of the Mind: Marked benefits to kindergarten children and their teachers.

Adele Diamond, Chris Lee, Peter Senften, Andrea Lam, David Abbott

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects of Prekindergarten Curricula: Tools of the Mind as a Case Study.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Reducing Aggression by Developing Emotional and Inhibitory Control.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adele DiamondProgram in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-6434
Chris LeeProgram in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Peter SenftenProgram in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Andrea LamProgram in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
David AbbottProgram in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Cognitive Functions Linked to Frontal LobeR01DA019685 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI DIAMOND, ADELE D · 2004 to 2009
$1.2M
Differences by Sex and Genotype in the Effects of Stress on Executive FunctionsR01DA037285 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI DIAMOND, ADELE D · 2014 to 2018
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019685NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kindergarten program, Tools of the Mind (Tools), has been shown to improve executive functions (as assessed by laboratory measures) and academic performance. The objective here was to see if Tools can improve executive functions in the real world (in the classroom), academic outcomes not previously investigated, reduce bullying and peer ostracism, and increase teachers' and students' joy in being in the classroom. This first randomized controlled trial of Tools in Canada included 351 kindergarten children (mean age 5.2 years at entry; 51% female) in 18 public schools. Stratified randomization resulted in teachers and students in both groups being closely matched. Teachers in both groups received the same number of training hours and same funds for new materials. Outcome measures were pre and post standardized academic skill assessments and teacher online survey responses. This study replicated that Tools improves reading and shows for the first time that it improves writing (far exceeding levels the school districts had seen before), self-control and attention-regulation in the real world (e.g., time on task without supervision), reduces teacher burnout and children being ostracized or excluded, and increases the joy students and teachers experience in school. By Spring, Tools teachers were still enthusiastic about teaching; control teachers were exhausted. These results were not only better than the control group but also better than Tools teachers experienced the year before Tools. Thus, children in a kindergarten curriculum that emphasized play, improving self-regulation, working together and helping one another, and hands-on learning performed better academically, showed less bullying and peer ostracism and more kindness and helping behavior than students in more traditional classes, and teacher enthusiasm for teaching soared. Tools reduced initial disparities separating children, schools, and teachers.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceAttentionBullyingCanadaChild, PreschoolCurriculumEmotionsFemaleHumansLearningMaleSchoolsSchool TeachersSelf-ControlStudentsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31527919
PMCPMC6748407
OpenAlexW2974682550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.