ArticlePloS one2019
Using DNA barcoding to improve invasive pest identification at U.S. ports-of-entry.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simple, rapid and cost-effective DNA extraction techniques for detection of economically important fruit flies in India.MethodsX · 2026Article
- From Traps to Taxa: Building a Robust DNA Barcode Reference Library for the Early Detection of Invasive Cerambycidae.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- A Real-Time PCR Assay for Detecting Codling MothInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Patterns of occurrence, phenology, and phylogeny of Phloeosinus punctatus LeConte (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in giant sequoia.Environmental entomology · 2024Article
- Molecular characterization and demographic insights into soybean bud borer (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Brazil.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2024Article
- Phylogeographic Reconstruction to Trace the Source Population of Asian Giant Hornet Caught in Nanaimo in Canada and Blaine in the USA.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Diversity of Parasitoids and Their Role in the Control of the Siberian Moth,Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Improving DNA barcoding library of armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in China.PloS one · 2024Article
- Implementation of machine learning in DNA barcoding for determining the plant family taxonomy.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Ultra-deep sequencing of 45S rDNA to discern intragenomic diversity in three Chrysodeixis species for molecular identification.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Taxonomic identification accuracy from BOLD and GenBank databases using over a thousand insect DNA barcodes from Colombia.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- DNA barcoding of insects from India: Current status and future perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- Article
- Rapid and zero-cost DNA extraction from soft-bodied insects for routine PCR-based applications.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- eDNA metabarcoding of small plankton samples to detect fish larvae and their preys from Atlantic and Pacific waters.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Hidden Genetic Variability, Can the Olive MothInsects · 2020Article
- One maternal lineage leads the expansion of Thaumastocoris peregrinus (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae) in the New and Old Worlds.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interception of potential invasive species at ports-of-entry is essential for effective biosecurity and biosurveillance programs. However, taxonomic assessment of the immature stages of most arthropods is challenging; characters for identification are often dependent on adult morphology and reproductive structures. This study aims to strengthen the identification of such specimens through DNA barcoding, with a focus on microlepidoptera. A sample of 241 primarily immature microlepidoptera specimens intercepted at U.S. ports-of-entry from 2007 to 2011 were selected for analysis. From this sample, 201 COI-5P sequences were generated and analyzed for concordance between morphology-based and DNA-based identifications. The retrospective analysis of the data over 10 years (2009 to 2019) using the Barcode of Life Data (BOLD) system demonstrates the importance of establishing and growing DNA barcode reference libraries for use in specimen identification. Additionally, analysis of specimen identification using public data (43.3% specimens identified) vs. non-public data (78.6% specimens identified) highlights the need to encourage researchers to make data publicly accessible. DNA barcoding surpassed morphological identification with 42.3% (public) and 66.7% (non-public) of the sampled specimens achieving a species-level identification, compared to 38.3% species-level identification by morphology. Whilst DNA barcoding was not able to identify all specimens in our dataset, its incorporation into border security programs as an adjunct to morphological identification can provide secondary lines of evidence and lower taxonomic resolution in many cases. Furthermore, with increased globalization, database records need to be clearly annotated for suspected specimen origin versus interception location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.