Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31527882›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Preserving cultural heritage: Analyzing the antifungal potential of ionic liquids tested in paper restoration.

Kevin Schmitz, Sebastian Wagner, Manfred Reppke, Christian Ludwig Maier, Elisabeth Windeisen-Holzhauser, J Philipp Benz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial Activity of Nano-GeOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Antifungal Agents in Wood Protection-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Ionic Liquids-A Review of Their Toxicity to Living Organisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Ionic Liquids as Antifungal Agents for Wood Preservation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin SchmitzWood Research Munich, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0278-4107
Sebastian WagnerWood Research Munich, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Manfred ReppkeWood Research Munich, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Christian Ludwig MaierFaculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich-Großhadern, Germany.
Elisabeth Windeisen-HolzhauserWood Research Munich, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
J Philipp BenzWood Research Munich, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEBehandlungszentrum Aschau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early industrialization and the development of cheap production processes for paper have led to an exponential accumulation of paper-based documents during the last two centuries. Archives and libraries harbor vast amounts of ancient and modern documents and have to undertake extensive endeavors to protect them from abiotic and biotic deterioration. While services for mechanical preservation such as ex post de-acidification of historic documents are already commercially available, the possibilities for long-term protection of paper-based documents against fungal attack (apart from temperature and humidity control) are very limited. Novel processes for mechanical enhancement of damaged cellulosic documents use Ionic Liquids (IL) as essential process components. With some of these ILs having azole-functionalities similar to well-known fungicides such as Clotrimazole, the possibility of antifungal activities of these ILs was proposed but has not yet been experimentally confirmed. We evaluated the potency of four ILs with potential application in paper restoration for suppression of fungal growth on five relevant paper-infesting molds. The results revealed a general antifungal activity of all ILs, which increased with the size of the non-polar group. Physiological experiments and ultimate elemental analysis allowed to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of each IL as well as the residual IL concentration in process-treated paper. These results provide valuable guidelines for IL-applications in paper restoration processes with antifungal activity as an added benefit. With azoles remaining in the paper after the process, simultaneous repair and biotic protection in treated documents could be facilitated.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsIonic LiquidsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular StructureAntifungal AgentsIonic Liquids

Identifiers

PMID31527882
PMCPMC6748409
OpenAlexW2974415098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.