Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31527731›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2019

Genomic evidence of human selection on Vavilovian mimicry.

Chu-Yu Ye, Wei Tang, Dongya Wu, Lei Jia, Jie Qiu, Meihong Chen, Lingfeng Mao, Feng Lin, Haiming Xu, Xiaoyue Yu and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Survey ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Chu-Yu Ye *Institute of Crop Sciences and Institute of Bioinformatics, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Wei Tang *State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, China.
Dongya Wu *Institute of Crop Sciences and Institute of Bioinformatics, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-2264
Lei JiaInstitute of Crop Sciences and Institute of Bioinformatics, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jie QiuInstitute of Crop Sciences and Institute of Bioinformatics, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1799-1907
Meihong ChenInstitute of Crop Sciences and Institute of Bioinformatics, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Lingfeng MaoInstitute of Crop Sciences and Institute of Bioinformatics, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Feng LinInstitute of Crop Sciences and Institute of Bioinformatics, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Haiming XuInstitute of Crop Sciences and Institute of Bioinformatics, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaoyue YuState Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, China.
Yongliang LuState Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, China.
Yonghong WangState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics and National Center for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Kenneth M OlsenDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8338-3638
Michael P TimkoDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Longjiang FanInstitute of Crop Sciences and Institute of Bioinformatics, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. fanlj@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4846-0500
Institute of Crop Sciences · CNChina National Rice Research Institute · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of Virginia · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vavilovian mimicry is an evolutionary process by which weeds evolve to resemble domesticated crop plants and is thought to be the result of unintentional selection by humans. Unravelling its molecular mechanisms will extend our knowledge of mimicry and contribute to our understanding of the origin and evolution of agricultural weeds, an important component of crop biology. To this end, we compared mimetic and non-mimetic populations of Echinochloa crus-galli from the Yangtze River basin phenotypically and by genome resequencing, and we show that this weed in rice paddies has evolved a small tiller angle, allowing it to phenocopy cultivated rice at the seedling stage. We demonstrate that mimetic lines evolved from the non-mimetic population as recently as 1,000 yr ago and were subject to a genetic bottleneck, and that genomic regions containing 87 putative plant architecture-related genes (including LAZY1, a key gene controlling plant tiller angle) were under selection during the mimicry process. Our data provide genome-level evidence for the action of human selection on Vavilovian mimicry.

Indexed as

OryzaPlant WeedsGenomicsHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID31527731
OpenAlexW2974041433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.