SynthesisScientific reports2019
Defence priming in Arabidopsis - a Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive meta-analysis reveals the key variables and scope of seed defense priming.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Pooled it
- The nicotinamide hypothesis revisited-plant defense signaling integrating PARP, nicotinamide, nicotinic acid, epigenetics, and glutathione.FEBS letters · 2025Review
- The Effect of Exogenously Applied Dicarboxylic Acids (Photon) on the Maize (Zea mays) Metabolite Profile.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2025Article
- Exocyst subunits EXO70B1 and B2 contribute to stomatal dynamics and cell wall modifications.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Green Leaf Volatiles: A New Player in the Protection against Abiotic Stresses?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Control of Peach Leaf Curl with Foliar Applications of Plant Immunity Inducers and Insights in Elicitation of Defense Responses againstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Revisiting plant stress memory: mechanisms and contribution to stress adaptation.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024Review
- Review
- BABA-induced pathogen resistance: a multi-omics analysis of the tomato response reveals a hyper-receptive status involving ethylene.Horticulture research · 2023Article
- Stress Management in Plants: Examining Provisional and Unique Dose-Dependent Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Early morpho-physiological response of oilseed rape under seed applied Sedaxane fungicide andFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Review
- Transcriptome Meta-Analysis Identifies Candidate Hub Genes and Pathways of Pathogen Stress Responses inBiology · 2022Article
- Does Abiotic Host Stress Favour Dothideomycete-Induced Disease Development?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Priming with Small Molecule-Based Biostimulants to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- Transcriptome Responses of WildPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Abiotic Stress and Belowground Microbiome: The Potential of Omics Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Heritable priming byFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Deciphering Genomes: Genetic Signatures of Plant-AssociatedFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Defence priming by organismal and non-organismal stimulants can reduce effects of biotic stress in plants. Thus, it could help efforts to enhance the sustainability of agricultural production by reducing use of agrochemicals in protection of crops from pests and diseases. We have explored effects of applying this approach to both Arabidopsis plants and seeds of various crops in meta-analyses. The results show that its effects on Arabidopsis plants depend on both the priming agent and antagonist. Fungi and vitamins can have strong priming effects, and priming is usually more effective against bacterial pathogens than against herbivores. Moreover, application of bio-stimulants (particularly vitamins and plant defence elicitors) to seeds can have promising defence priming effects. However, the published evidence is scattered, does not include Arabidopsis, and additional studies are required before we can draw general conclusions and understand the molecular mechanisms involved in priming of seeds' defences. In conclusion, defence priming of plants has clear potential and application of bio-stimulants to seeds may protect plants from an early age, promises to be both labour- and resource-efficient, poses very little environmental risk, and is thus both economically and ecologically promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.