Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31527485›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2019

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of B Vitamin Supplementation on Depressive Symptoms, Anxiety, and Stress: Effects on Healthy and 'At-Risk' Individuals.

Lauren M Young, Andrew Pipingas, David J White, Sarah Gauci, Andrew Scholey

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Vitamin D and Vitamin BDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Menopause and Mental Health.Advances in therapy · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lauren M YoungCentre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia. laurenyoung@swin.edu.au.
Andrew PipingasCentre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia. apipingas@swin.edu.au.
David J WhiteCentre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia. dawhite@swin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8694-1474
Sarah GauciCentre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia. sarahgauci@swin.edu.au.
Andrew ScholeyCentre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia. andrew@scholeylab.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4484-5462

Funding

Bayer HealthCare CHP05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to examine and quantify the effects of B vitamin supplementation on mood in both healthy and 'at-risk' populations. A systematic search identified all available randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of daily supplementation with ≥3 B group vitamins with an intervention period of at least four weeks. Random effects models for a standardized mean difference were used to test for overall effect. Heterogeneity was tested using the I

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAdolescentAdultAffectAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsVitamin B ComplexanxietyB-vitaminsdepressionmental healthmeta-analysismoodreviewstress

Identifiers

PMID31527485
PMCPMC6770181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.